User talk:SphericalSong

Atakor volcanic field
Greetings,

is it absolutely necessary for the references in Atakor volcanic field to be strung along each other in the article text? The rest of the article uses sfn markup. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 21:04, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, okay, I'll work out how to do the other style and will change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SphericalSong (talk • contribs)
 * This edit still needs fixing. And it may put too much focus on the plume-plate debate for this article; Atakor is not that commonly used as a subject in these debates. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, fair enough. Perhaps there's too much on the two hypotheses and it's not the appropriate place for these details. I'll go back to it later on and revise it. I'll fix the referencing issue too. SphericalSong (talk) 15:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Plate theory (volcanism) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plate theory (volcanism) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Plate theory (volcanism) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)