User talk:Sphilbrick/Archive 75

Draft: Esco Group of Companies
Can you restore this page? I know that the page is not yet approved and has need rejected due to notability. But, we are still working on the page and getting some articles to establish notability. Please restore the talk page so I can send the comments to my colleagues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.57.42.139 (talk) 02:23, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Draft:Esco Group of Companies exists.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  14:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Editor abcdef
Hi Sphilbrick. When you get the chance would you mind taking a look at User talk:Editor abcdef? This is the second time I informed the editor about this kind of thing and I'm not sure how else to try to explain it to them. Maybe there's nothing which can really be done in such cases. Anyway, File:Jabhat al-Akrad logo.png needs to be reduced and tagged with furd, but doing so means the older version will be deleted. I think this is the second time this editor has done something like this on this particular file. Any suggestions on how to best proceed? -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I will take a look.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  14:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you Sphilbrick for leaving that user talk page message. Unfortunately, I have a feeling this might not the last time this editor does this. The file was tagged with "furd" by another editor, so the other version is eventually going to be deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:34, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Deleted - Ravi Ramnarain
Dear Mr./Ms. Sphilbrick,

I submitted an article on Miami CFO/CPA Ravi Ramnarain about 40 days ago, and it was removed due to "Unambiguous Advertising" reasons. I am contacting you pursuant to how I can edit this page so that it might be accepted the second or even third time. Thank you very much for your consideration and effort.

Sincerely, D ferrell (talk) 13:04, 28 December 2016 (UTC)D. Ferrell
 * ✅ It needs a lot of work. Please make an off wiki copy in case someone sees it and nominates it for deletion. -- S Philbrick (Talk)  13:09, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Not again....
It always happens when I start my day on EN-wiki. Could you please remove my ip again? Thanks! Did you get through the holidays without major damage? -- Hedwig in Washington (TALK) 01:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- S Philbrick (Talk)  12:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you! SMirC-coffeebreak.svg -- Hedwig in Washington (TALK) 23:32, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

SS Bombo deletion
Hi @Sphilbrick, you requested speedy deletion of the draft page SS Bombo which I had been very carefully creating, and unfortunately it has now been deleted before I had the opportunity to contest this request. I don't understand the reason for your request, as (a) the page was just a Draft and it hadn't been yet submitted for review & general release; and (b) I have tried to be scrupulous about citing copious references for all of content and images. The history shows the attention given to crafting this article.

The actual content which seems to have triggered your request appears to be this, in the section "Wreck" ...

Both these paragraphs were inserted verbatim from the www.afloat source (along with following text from other sources) just to facilitate my "internal" editing of the draft, as this allowed me to properly compare, consolidate & paraphrase content from all the sources on the one page. You can see that I prefaced the "offending" text with the words (to edit), as I had no intention of using the content as-is, but just dropped it onto the draft page immediately prior to logging-out for the night. I have included attribution for this source material at the end of paragraph 2, just not for paragraph 1 (my oversight).

Can you please advise how I can have the page recovered, even if without the "Wreck" section (ie restore to any version prior to 30th Dec 2016 if necessary)? The article has been patiently assembled from many sources, each one carefully cited, and includes a number of historical photos which I have also placed into Commons. I confess that I was unaware that a Draft needed to comply with all WPs policies, so thanks for the lesson!

Thanks ❮❮  GEEKSTREET  Talk Lane ❯❯ 22:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Although we don't require drafts to be fully compliant with all rules immediately, there is one rule where we take a hard line — copyrights. Text and images subject to copyright which have not been released under a license agreement cannot be used anywhere in Wikipedia, not in articles not in drafts not in talk pages. I understand that some people will start with a copy of material under copyright, and then edit it so that it removes the copyright problem, but that practice is doubly flawed. The best practice is to look at multiple sources of information and then craft something in your own words. When you start with someone else's words even if you do it off line, there's a chance you will retain the structure and only lightly paraphrase it which is still a copyright violation. Secondly if you do this editing online, violations a copyright will occur in earlier versions before the edits. Not everyone realizes this but we are concerned about copyright violations even in prior versions of articles, including drafts.


 * Normally, we don't restore anything with a copyright violation but I will see if I can restore it to a version prior to the added material. Please make sure to check the rest of the article; while I don't recall precisely I identified one problematic section but I thought that might have been others, I could be wrong.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  23:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- S Philbrick (Talk)  23:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Digital Group Inc.
Hi Sphilbrick,

You have deleted a page I have been working on - The Digital Group Inc. I haven’t finished working on this article and hence limited information may have been the reason why you deleted the page.

As per SiliconIndia Magazine, the organization I am writing about features in the list of India’s top 50 Small & Startup IT companies – 2013 to work with. It is companies like these that are leading the change in the Small and Startup sectors of India. This company in addition to achieving the numerous ISO certifications (as mentioned in the content) has also achieved the CMMi Development Level 5 and CMMi Services Level 5 certifications. It has also lead CSR activities such as a donation drive to support an NGO called Manavya (that works for HIV+ Women & Children), a donation drive for Nepal (when it was struck by 2 massive earthquakes in April 2015), a donation drive for the Chennai flood victims (December 2015), a tree plantation drive. I am genuinely trying to create awareness about the work done by such upcoming enterprises in Tier I cities of India and I feel Wikipedia can be an appropriate platform.

Request you to kindly restore the page so that this information can be added to the page. Please do let me know if there are other issues that I should pay attention to. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elise lowry (talk • contribs) 10:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ See User:Elise lowry/The Digital Group Inc. -- S Philbrick (Talk)  13:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Digital Group Inc.
Hi Sphilbrick,

You have deleted a page I have been working on - The Digital Group Inc. I haven’t finished working on this article and hence limited information may have been the reason why you deleted the page.

As per SiliconIndia Magazine, the organization I am writing about features in the list of India’s top 50 Small & Startup IT companies – 2013 to work with. It is companies like these that are leading the change in the Small and Startup sectors of India. This company in addition to achieving the numerous ISO certifications (as mentioned in the content) has also achieved the CMMi Development Level 5 and CMMi Services Level 5 certifications. It has also lead CSR activities such as a donation drive to support an NGO called Manavya (that works for HIV+ Women & Children), a donation drive for Nepal (when it was struck by 2 massive earthquakes in April 2015), a donation drive for the Chennai flood victims (December 2015), a tree plantation drive. I am genuinely trying to create awareness about the work done by such upcoming enterprises in Tier I cities of India and I feel Wikipedia can be an appropriate platform.

Request you to kindly restore the page so that this information can be added to the page. Please do let me know if there are other issues that I should pay attention to. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elise lowry (talk • contribs) 10:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ See User:Elise lowry/The Digital Group Inc. -- S Philbrick (Talk)  13:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Draft:Riot Jazz Brass Band
I restored Draft:Riot Jazz Brass Band by request here. I think you deleted again afterwards — did I do something wrong by restoring it, or was it an accident? Κσυπ Cyp  15:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * There is a lot of activity in G13th this morning, but that's partly an aside; I see that the article was restored but no one has edited it so it still qualifies as a G 13. I restored it but whomever wanted to work on it ought to make an edit.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  15:14, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok, I've now notified them that it was undeleted, hopefully they will start working on it. Κσυπ Cyp  15:31, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Audi Marissa
Hi, Sphilbrick, happy new year! I see that you deleted Audi Marissa as G5 – thanks for that, I had meant to re-open the SPI but must have let it slide. Anyway, it's now been re-opened. Do you feel like adding the name of the editor to the current round of investigation for the record? I'd do it myself, but of course I can no longer see it and can't remember it. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:49, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It is Joanna Gunadi, already on the list-- S Philbrick (Talk)  17:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hmm, did someone do a histmerge? That page was deleted by – or at least, that's what I thought when I wrote . Yep, the log seems to confirm that. It's the name of the editor who re-created it in November last year that I'm after. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:08, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I just looked at the initial creater, but looks like after deletion, it was recreated by user:Terry Shelton (already blocked as sock).-- S Philbrick (Talk)  22:15, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Sruti Respati
Hi. Please don't delete article Sruti Respati, because I have references for it:

Thank you. Igho (talk) 22:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It wasn't deleted for lack of references it was deleted because it was created by a banned or blocked user. Assuming you are neither, feel free to start over. (I see that you are new, if you don't know why we delete articles, even ones that might otherwise be acceptable, when they are created by a banned or blocked user, please ask.)-- S Philbrick (Talk)  22:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Ya, I'm new in English Wikipedia. I am from Indonesia and I didn't create this article. So, would you mind to make it back? Thank. Igho (talk) 23:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It was deleted properly. However, if you would like to create an article about the subject, feel free to do so.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  23:14, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Sphilbrick!


Happy New Year! Sphilbrick, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Donner60 (talk) 07:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.


 * Thank-you!

Indonesian films deletion
Hi Sphilbrick. I got a message that my draft was marked for deletion. I was able to take action 4 hours later and the article was already deleted. I fully intend to finish this article, could you undelete it please? Thanks!

Hi, Sphilbrick! I see you deleted many Indonesian films, actors and an award ceremony such as Guru Bangsa: Tjokroaminoto, Filosofi Kopi, Athirah, Chico Jerikho, Deddy Sutomo, Cut Mini and the 5th Annual Maya Awards. I just wanna know why? Is it because the lack of references or others? Thank you. Delement —Preceding undated comment added 04:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Please see my response to Igho immediately above this; each of those articles was deleted because they were created by a banned or blocked user. Please feel free to re-create any of those articles. It has nothing to do with references.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  12:59, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Sin senos no hay paraíso
Hi, I think there was an error with respect to this article, because all the history was deleted and also the article ?. Maybe I did things wrong or did not understand very well what happened, but already the article Sin senos no hay paraíso, does not exist, just wanted to move the page to another title, but could not because the article would not allow me.--  Philip J Fry   Talk    21:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what's going on. Here it is, sort of Sin Senos no Hay Paraíso, but I haven't sorted out what happened.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  22:00, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Exactly, but the content of the article is not seen, it is totally empty and the history only talks about a redirection.--  Philip J Fry   Talk    22:02, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I recovered it. I think the page move request was malformed although I may have acted on it too quickly. I see the page to be moved is a red link and I normally check the page to be moved and make sure it exists so I'm not quite sure what happened. However I think were back to where we started from so maybe you know what should happen next.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  22:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)


 * That looks better.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  22:33, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of The Street art and graffiti UPDATE
Hi Sphilbrick, can I ask why you deleted my update? I feel your section doest cover the true extent of Cardiff graffiti art. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Art_in_Cardiff&oldid=757263315 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.3.202.189 (talk) 12:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * As a new editor, you may not be familiar with edit summaries but I explained the rationale in the edit summary. Look in the "view history" tab to see the entry for the edit along with the edit summary, in which I explained you improperly copied material from a copyrighted source.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  12:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi Sphilbrick, I'm the artist and I wrote the original content on the website...please can you respecify rectify the deletion please...many thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.3.202.189 (talk) 10:09, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Material you have written can only be used (other than short quotes which are quoted and sourced) if it is both suitable for the encyclopedia and properly licensed. See the following page for information on how to provide evidence of a license: Donating copyrighted materials-- S Philbrick (Talk)  14:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Indonesian musicians deletion
Hi, Sphilbrick! I see you deleted many Indonesian musician such as Adhitia Sofyan, Geisha (Indonesian group), HIVI!, Gamaliel Audrey Cantika. I just wanna know why? Is it because the lack of references or others? Thank you. Teddy Bear (talk) 13:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Please look upthread User_talk:Sphilbrick and User_talk:Sphilbrick-- S Philbrick (Talk)  14:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

An article has been mistakenly protected
Dear Sphilbrick,

You're doing a very good job on Wikipedia. But recently, you may have unintentionally protected the page Hsiung Feng III by accident. The page has been repeatedly vandalized by the IP editors 118.168.100.131 and 91.125.28.80 as well as another person Primefac who apparently are trying to push their pov and change the article from it's original version without consensus. The previous unvandalized consensus based version of the article listed the Hsiung Feng III as both a nuclear missile and hypersonic missile which is supported by facts and academic references but apparently these IP editors wanted to push their false pov that Taiwan "does not have nuclear weapons" and that the missile is "not hypersonic" while ignoring or dismissing the references. Many efforts were made to discuss the issue but they ignored the academic sources. The current version of the article is incorrect, Taiwan built and tested two nuclear bombs in southern Taiwan during the 1980s. Please review the following sources and consider unprotecting the Hsiung Feng III page or at least reverting the edit to it's original unvandalized version:  17:38, 4 January 2017‎ 45.254.247.21

1.)  From Wikipedia Taiwan and weapons of mass destruction page: "ROC successfully conducted its diminutive nuclear test in southern Taiwan in the 1980s."     http://www.chinanews.com/2000-1-7/26/14868.html

2.)  Taiwan fires hypersonic missile:     https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1718956/taiwanese-navy-accidentally-fires-hypersonic-missile-at-fishing-vessel-as-tensions-with-enemies-china-ratcheted-up/

3.) Taiwan accidently fires nuclear missile:    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/taiwanese-navy-accidentally-fires-nuclear-8730387

4.)  Japan and Taiwan both maintain a discreet policy of having secret undeclared nuclear weapons, a "nuclear bomb in the basement" policy, please read:        http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/fukushima-anniversary/japan-has-nuclear-bomb-basement-china-isnt-happy-n48976

5.) "A study by the Mitre Corporation in 1977 included Taiwan in a list of "insecure" nuclear threshold states—states with the technical capability to develop nuclear weapons and the security motivations to seriously contemplate such an option. The other states were Israel, South Africa, South Korea, and Yugoslavia."    Report of the Nuclear Energy Policy Study Group, Nuclear Power Issues and Choices (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co., 1977), p. 284.

6.) "U.S. intelligence believed that the Republic of China also had designed devices suitable for nuclear testing"     http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB190/03.pdf

Thank you! Sincerely, 45.254.247.8 (talk) 18:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * 45.254.247.8, I doubt it was 'accidentally' protected! But on the specific matter you have been reverted on, it should be pointed out that some of the sources you present here are not, in fact, according to Wikipedia, reliable sources for such claims as are being made. specifically, the Sun and Mirror are WP:TABLOID, whilst Chinanews does not meet the requirement that sources are independent of their subject, and the remainder, whilst indeed qualifying as relIable sources, do not prove the claim made. They only speculate that RoC can do such a thing; whereas the proposed edits claim that it has been done. Do you see the difference? It is to prevent speculation masquerading as fact that SPhibric protected that page. Regards, O Fortuna!  ...Imperatrix mundi.  19:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The protection is not accidental. This would be a good time for the participants to sort out issues without edit warring. If it can be sorted out before the production expires, an edit request can be used, or if everything is truly sorted out a request for removal of protection will be entertained.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  19:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Page restoration request
Hi Sphilbrick-- Would you be willing to restore the page Draft:Lee Munnich? I was waiting on my colleague to offer input and waited too long! Since I started the page, Mr. Munnich received the University of Minnesota President’s Award for Outstanding Service and an internship was started in his honor at the Humphrey School of Public Policy; I had been planning to add these two new pieces of information and submit the page. Thank you for your consideration! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tzi80 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I think you mean Draft:Lee Munnich. (FYI, I will not be around much tomorrow.) -- S Philbrick (Talk)  02:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * That is correct, I meant Draft:Lee Munnich. I've made the correction above. My apologies! Tzi80 (talk) 10:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)User:Tzi80

reply: nomination for deletion of one of the photographs I have uploaded.
Hi Sphilbrick

As you have sought clarification on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kmrarun about a photograph, I would like apprise that the photo is clicked by Mr. Navtej Singh but I have uploaded with his consent on wikipedia for the viewers. Please specify why would you nominate the same for deletion? 'Consent of creator is taken' == consent of photographer is obtained .. but since the phrase did confuse you, I am changing the words. Please see if you are ok with the same else you may like to specify what should I do?

Warm Regards

Dr. Arun Bansal kmrarun@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.246.18 (talk) 14:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I am happy to hear that you have arranged for permission, but such permission must be filed with OTRS. Once permission is filed and accepted, the nonfree use rationale should be removed; that rationale is for images without permission. Suitable language can be found here:


 * OTRS (Note particularly the interactive release generator which is an easy way to generate the permission)-- S Philbrick (Talk)  15:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Dear Sphilbrick

I would be going through OTRS. I have a query. I am administrator of one of the groups on FB (Natural Biodiversity) where we have sought implicit permission from all the members of the group (group is under GPL). Can I send the group information on OTRS once to get authorized or I have to submit the same or different proof for each contribution? Further I did upload the image with intention to upload more, possibly in bulk, to propagate and support research. Is there any way to do so with better ease? We have thousands of pics, almost all of those are classified with ID, Place of click, and Date. Please suggest and guide.

Regards

124.124.110.161 (talk) 04:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * We can definitely handle this in bulk. That said, that process is not common, and not well-defined, so I will put together some additional information later today.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  13:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I need to run something by some other OTRS admins, working on it soon.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  15:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Restore a deleted page: The Voice Kids Indonesia
Hi Sphilbrick, You have deleted a draft page I created a few months ago. I was not able to continue editing it at the time, but am interested in doing so now. Could you please restore Draft:Tamar Rachum ? Many thanks. Nasriya (talk) 8 January 2017, 09.29 (UTC)
 * FYI -sockpuppet.  Special:Contributions/Nasriya.  (Which suggests that the prior requester was also a sock who was simply sloppy in copy / pasting his / her request here.)  JohnInDC (talk) 14:08, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'd normally just do this, but let's wait until the sock investigation concludes.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  14:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, yes, absolutely. I was just letting you know in case they asked any more favors.  Thanks.  JohnInDC (talk) 17:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I understand John. I try to take a "liberal" view toward restoring articles and will generally do so simply if asked with only a few exceptions — copyvios being the main exception. My comment was more directed toward the OP to let them know why I'm not doing at this time.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  17:24, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Restore a Deleted Page - Tamar Rachum
Hi Sphilbrick, You have deleted a draft page I created a few months ago. I was not able to continue editing it at the time, but am interested in doing so now. Could you please restore Draft:Tamar Rachum ? Many thanks, OmriOmri rt (talk) 14:39, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- S Philbrick (Talk)  18:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * After reviewing it in light of this page, I have deleted the draft as a copyvio.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  18:27, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Restore modified page: Ronald Karel
Hi Sphilbrick. Apologies for reverting the changes of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Karel without discussing with you. It's my very first Wiki edit and so didn't know about all these intricacies. I can see that the content of this page http://www.meteoquake.org/biographie.html is similar to the one I have added in my edited Wiki. But I would like to mention that these two are in fact the same person and so he has provided me these details from the other page. What shall I do now to make things ok? Many thanks! Zia (Talk)  9 January 2017  —Preceding undated comment added 18:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll respond on your talk page, which will take some time.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  19:18, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Merge and delete
Please look at this diff. Now that the source with the attribution has been deleted, this appears to me to be a license violation. Thanks, Unscintillating (talk) 15:50, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I am running out in minutes for most of the day, will try to check this evening.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  15:52, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries. Unscintillating (talk) 15:58, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree, I removed and rev-deled. I suppose I should discuss, but I'll let it go unless questions arise.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  01:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * That solves the problem. Thanks, Unscintillating (talk) 02:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

request for WP:REFUND
Hello Sphilbrick, can you please restore Draft:Comparison of Robotic Simulators to that location? It was a 2014 AfC which never quite made it, but the topic-matter may have another shot in 2017, with any luck. I believe G13 just means 'too old' but if there are any copyvios or other reasons not to restore the content, please let me know. Thanks much 47.222.203.135 (talk) 06:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅-- S Philbrick (Talk)  13:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:James Walter McLeod and Draft talk:James Walter McLeod
You have just deleted these two pages. Would you like to go back, read the two pages again, and comment on the situation? Charles Matthews (talk) 16:53, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * No, but I'll read your comments.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  17:17, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Well then. I added a hang on template to the draft, which is about a Fellow of the Royal Society. You deleted it anyway, in a large batch, at 16:51. You presumably didn't notice the template. Charles Matthews (talk) 17:32, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * No I didn't, but I've been deleting G13s and making sure they were properly marked, which they were, so the editor that missed it was the editor who nominated it.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  17:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm sitting in a hotel lobby, waiting for a shuttle bus, with a sketchy internet connection I guess you want it restored, not sure why you haven't said so, but if I can get to it before the bus arrives, I will.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  17:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅-- S Philbrick (Talk)  17:42, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. On User talk:Charles Matthews you can see that a message was left for me at 16:42. I went and added hang on and wrote on the talk page and developed the article immediately. Procedurally I have no reason to use Articles for Creation. Two other editors have done that. I gave you a chance to figure it out. Charles Matthews (talk) 17:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The page listed you as the nominator - I think that is an error that requires investigation. -- S Philbrick (Talk)  02:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Duplication
Dear Sir, We have to reconsider the page Mithila (region) page since there is already two articles named Mithila, Nepal and Mithila, India from which the paragraphs, etomology and termology are copy edited. Thank you! (The China Room (talk) 04:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)) The China Room (talk) 04:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I have no idea what this means, but unless I need to do something, I don't need more info.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  05:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 20
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 20, November-December 2016 by, , ,

 Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Partner resource expansions
 * New search tool for finding TWL resources
 * # 1lib1ref 2017
 * Wikidata Visiting Scholar