User talk:Spicc7

A tag has been placed on Dr pat francis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DearPrudence 18:31, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Message posted on Friday, May 25, 2007
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Evb-wiki 18:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Reason 'Dr pat francis' should be deleted
Not quite sure how our warning messages could be described as vague, but, in any case, to have articles on Wikipedia, people need to meet certain notability guidelines. The articles do not explain why this person meets that. Also, external links within the prose of the article are generally frowed upon, as it makes the article look like spam; articles should be written entirely from a neutral point of view, and certainly not advertise. Finally, Wikipedia's content is 'free', as in, 'free speech', so we cannot accept copyrighted material, such as was copied from another website in this article. Feel free to contact me on my talk page if you would like any further explanation. J Milburn 18:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)