User talk:SpiderMandem

Why are you creating redlinks?
Why do you keep creating links to non-existent pages for Vietcong units? Unless you are creating pages for those units and making them live at the same time stop creating links to pages that don't exist. I am reverting all the redlinks that you have created, please stop making unnecessary work. Also stop aggregating individual and crew-served weapons, the differentiation ties into the whole body count point that the PAVN/VC usually tried to recover weapons which is why dead outnumber weapons captured. Crew-served weapons would require more than 1 soldier to operate, but if just an aggregated weapons number is given that detail is lost. However there is no need to state US material losses as such losses were irrelevant to the US. Mztourist (talk) 09:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

phone numbers
With this edit you changed a NATO Stock Number to a phone number. This is clearly incorrect, and while these edits may be caused by browser plug-ins, this does not remove your responsibility for your own edits. Please review changes before saving to make sure that you do not accidently change numbers in an article to phone numbers.Nigel Ish (talk) 22:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Likewise for this edit you made to Prisoner of war (which also made all post-WWII conflicts subsections of WWII). -- Perey (talk) 09:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Battle of najaf
Weird, I was less than 200 yards from the mosque after the cease fire and watching the militia leave, I was with 1st bn 4marines but I didn’t see 1/5 cav there 74.211.34.2 (talk) 13:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)