User talk:Spike112

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! &mdash; Rod talk 17:26, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

East Riding College
hi there, thanks for your recent edits to East Riding College. I especially thank you for locating the latest ofsted inspection report as a reference on the article, as that helps it a lot. I feel I do have to point out a few things though -


 * Firstly the Criticism section is based around that ofsted report. Although that ofsted report does criticise the college many times for many things, its also praises the college in some areas as well. All wikipedia articles should be of a neutral point of view, not biased. So, the sections should be called something like Ofsted inspection and should list the goods and the bads.


 * Also, the line in the New campuses section about students views on new facilities is unsourced and quite contraversial. For a statement like that to stay on wikipedia, it MUST be sourced, or it has to be removed. but perhaps a student Union website or newspaper could provide a source?

So I have had to change a few things what you added. but dont be disheartened. if youve got any questions or need any help, just message me on my talk page. Bleaney (talk) 21:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Actually, on closer inspection the latest ofsted report is much more positive about the college, so I have had to remove the criticism section completely and (sadly) the reference for the (old) ofsted report. Sorry, but thats the way it goes. Bleaney (talk) 21:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Hawthorns Caravan Park
A tag has been placed on The Hawthorns Caravan Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 16:22, 8 April 2010 (UTC)