User talk:Spinkava

Notable Alpha Phi Omega people
I reverted it because we have the national office as a source (see the edit history), and that's pretty much the most official record you can get of whether or not someone is a brother and which chapter they belong to. Justinm1978 (talk) 22:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

However, your source is a "personal conversation", I have a newspaper article. I will call national next week to clear this up. Spinkava 22:47, 22 February 2008
 * I would tell you how I got those boxes, but you seem to have figured it out already :) Justinm1978 (talk) 04:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: User:spinkava/GGWO → Greater Grace World Outreach
What you have proposed is a merge request, not a move request, as extensive page history already exists at the latter location. Please visit WP:PM for instructions no how to propose/request at merger. Thanks. JPG-GR (talk) 05:52, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Talk Pages
Spinkava: for future reference, please place your new talk messages at the bottom of the page. Your request for the review of Greater Grace World Outreach was placed at the top of the talk page which makes it harder to find, and acknowledge. Tiggerjay (talk) 16:55, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Greater Grace World Outreach
Please note that I recently performed some BOLD edits to Greater Grace World Outreach in hopes to help clarify and bring neutrality to the article, however there is still some major work that needs to be done since I do not have enough background information. I am simply coming in as an edit to help clean-up the mess. :) Please see my comments on the article talk page, along with some in-line comments in the article. Tiggerjay (talk) 18:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Greater Grace World Outreach
Thank you for your involvement with editing this page and your interest in having a consensus reached in this article so the block can be lifted and the article to be brought to some sort of consensus. I was brought in by a request on the Christianity Project page to have someone review the article. I have absolutely no former knowledge of GGWO, nor any particular bias. All I can tell you it in its current state, it looks like an absolute disaster (both the article, and the organization as a whole). My hopes is to help bring the interested editors to the table on the talk page to resolve the conflicts and have the page properly created/edited. Please take a moment to go over to the talk page and review my most recent postings. Also do no be alarmed as your earlier comments/posts were refactored and archived (there is a link available on the page to the archive). My post is only one of several which will hopefully help guide this page towards something everybody can agree is appropriate. Tiggerjay (talk) 00:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Fresh Prospective
Spinkava: Please take a moment while on your break to contribute to non-religious / non-christian / non-GGWO while you're on break. Spend your time contributing to something regarding teaching, or mathematics or anything else that interests you... It would be a great break and give you an opporunity to work on editing an article with like minded contributors. Tiggerjay (talk) 22:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GGWO Logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:GGWO Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:GGWO Affiliation Handbook 2008.pdf
Thanks for uploading File:GGWO Affiliation Handbook 2008.pdf. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 20 June 2018 (UTC)