User talk:SpinningCeres

Welcome!
 Hi SpinningCeres! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. I appreciate your efforts to fight vandalism – if you'd like to get more involved, you may want to check out the WikiLoop Double Check anti-vandalism tool or enroll in the Counter-Vandalism Unit's training academy.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 18:35, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Friendly advice
Hi SpinningCeres! I hope you're doing well and that you're having an awesome day! I wanted to let you know that I (happily) responded to this IP user's unblock request and declined it. Just some friendly advice from one editor to another: Don't put any kind of "obligation" upon yourself to respond to or address any ridiculous or completely-baseless accusations like the one that the IP user made about you and Materialscientist being sock buddies. ;-) Wanna know something crazy (and perhaps funny)? I started here as a vandal and troll too! Seriously! Look at my contributions and jump to my very first ones. It sounds like you did the same. Oh well, no big deal. You've moved on and you did the same thing I did back in the day when I was new - you jumped the fence and wanted to start doing good things here, and you have. If users like this person make ridiculous accusations or try and discredit your current correct actions because of your past, that's something that I wouldn't even waste my time with responding to or trying to address. People who resort to that kind of reasoning behind their own actions are the same kind of people that you'll never convince differently from the opinions that they crafted and taped together based off of... pretty much nothing. Don't waste your time. Instead, you could've been spending that time making more great contributions, addressing issues, helping another user who actually wants to be here and benefit the project, the list goes on! Don't let them drain your enthusiasm for this project, and definitely don't let them drain your precious time that you choose to spend helping this encyclopedia to grow. You don't have to prove anything to anyone, and you don't owe anyone an explanation if their accusations come from out their... you-know-whats... ;-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   04:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the advice, kind words, and declining the unblock request! SpinningCeres (talk) 04:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem. I was happy to handle that unblock request. ;-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   04:16, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

A Night at Switch n' Play
I am the director of A Night at Switch n' Play and am asking for corrections to errors on the page. I am following the guidelines based in this wikipedia contact page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us/Article_subjects)

I am asking for the identities and pronouns of the performers to be corrected. There's a lack of neutral and straightforward language that misrepresents living people based on a poorly sourced material (as outlined in this Wikpedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Remove_contentious_material_that_is_unsourced_or_poorly_sourced).

The Queer Guru source that is cited for the cast descriptions contains a number of original interpretations or descriptions of the performers that can be considered offensive, and these descriptions are also reproduced word-for-word. This source's descriptions are not accurate and misinterpret the characterizations offered in the film. The language in this article regarding the cast's description is transphobic, defamatory and contentious.

As stated in Wikipedia's "Reliable Sources Section": contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.95.186 (talk) 21:51, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Let's keep this all in one place User_talk:ScottishFinnishRadish. -- Valjean (talk) 22:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

February 8
Hi SpinningCeres: Please view the talk section in the Katherine Delmar Burke's wiki where I am instructed to add in info specific to Burke's and using primary sources (the most reliable); I also added back in some secondary, please contribute to the talk section — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:8300:C6D0:218B:643D:B483:7A12 (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

February 15
I am not OK with the mass deletion you just did. I was doing good work and going in and sourcing before you reverted. Not OK. Please stop editing me. I've found you and others too heavy handed and asked for help at the tree house but they say since it's a user it's an admin complaint. Filing one on you seems like the most effective, so please stop. No threats. I'll do that since this is really counter productive and oddly personal.Factsforsure44 (talk) 17:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I just explained the revert on your talk page. I am going to be offline for the next few hours so I recommend discussing edits (without walls of text) on the article talk page. Please create new section headers when you post on my talk page. SpinningCeres 17:04, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * As I think you requested, I cannot contribute to the talk page. I was completely available to discuss edits before I believed editors colluded to shut down good edits. I am not trusting what you say now. Factsforsure44 (talk) 17:09, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

I forgot that auto confirmed requires three days, I apologize. Please use your talk page and ask the other two editors to refer there for discussion for now. SpinningCeres 17:14, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)