User talk:Splinemath

Archives

-- need some advice --
I get alot of stupid deletes on pages i tried to create, and adding information on current pages. To create a new list of manufacturers of a certain product type, I copied the page of Piano Makers and the page was deleted. It was identicle, just substitute Piano for my product type. I added to a list of what a store sells. It already had "xyz sold clothes, appliances, and outdoor equiptment". I added boats(that they sold in the 60's and cited a page, and the person deleted all the items calling it "promotional material" ?!??!?!?! My best is where i tried to create a page of the school i went to that was razed 20ish years ago and it was deleted because it is "advertising"?!?!?!?!?

Am i going about this wrong or is wiki just edited by idiots?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The 0utsider1 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Try to have two or more secondary sources for each page you create.-Splinemath (talk) 06:03, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Matthew F. Hale. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Plagiarism, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. 2600:1700:B7A1:9A30:58DD:46B7:35C0:E0C1 (talk) 23:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bela (company)


A tag has been placed on Bela (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 02:59, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

"Jew" vs. "Jewish person"
Hi Splinemath,

Regarding this edit, I'm sure you mean well, but there's nothing wrong with the word Jew. In fact, according to The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, fourth edition (2000), "It is widely recognized that the attributive use of the noun Jew, in phrases such as Jew lawyer or Jew ethics, is both vulgar and highly offensive. In such contexts Jewish is the only acceptable possibility. Some people, however, have become so wary of this construction that they have extended the stigma to any use of Jew as a noun, a practice that carries risks of its own. In a sentence such as There are now several Jews on the council, which is unobjectionable, the substitution of a circumlocution like Jewish people or persons of Jewish background may in itself cause offense for seeming to imply that Jew has a negative connotation when used as a noun." Hope that's helpful. Jayjg (talk) 20:43, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bug Fables: The Everlasting Sapling


The article Bug Fables: The Everlasting Sapling has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable indie game. One brief article about its trailer (and two non-independent sources) is not sufficient to support a claim of notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:48, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Bug Fables: The Everlasting Sapling for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bug Fables: The Everlasting Sapling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bug Fables: The Everlasting Sapling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BilCat (talk) 11:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of OneSwarm


A tag has been placed on OneSwarm, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of CurveBall for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CurveBall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CurveBall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Sohom (talk) 03:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC)