User talk:Split Infinity

My talk page.
Not much to say. I keep replacing the content of the page accidentally through JavaScript, so I always end up having to fix it. :l

..
I am sorry, I was just stating my opinion. I really don't think that is needed in the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.247.220.241 (talk) 04:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC).

Your VandalProof Application
Dear Split Infinity,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Prodego  talk  22:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Chapter Zero
My company is one of the most notable in the rock entertainment industry. Yet, omniscient Wikipedia admins are charged with having a comprehensive index of what entities are notable in every sector of the human experience. With all that knowledge, who needs Wikipedia! This self-righteous attitude is infuriating. That you assume to be aware of the situation and make a judgement with zero knowledge makes you a perfect fit for the Admin mold. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.142.140.177 (talk) 19:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC).
 * See WP:NOT. That probably explains why your article was deleted.

kiwi
Please try to bring other people to my deletion debate -- Master 23:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * That would be hard to do. People will come and see your nomination, don't worry. :) -- Split Infinity (talk) 23:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

your sure? -- Master 23:43, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'm sure. -- Split Infinity (talk) 23:46, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Test
I assume your deletion of my question here means that your original comment posted on my talk page was a mistake, so I have likewise deleted it from my talk page, and you could go ahead and delete this current comment also, to keep your own talk page clear of clutter. If that is not the case, please answer the question as to why you posted that comment on my talk page. Wahkeenah 02:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * That's strange, I don't recall deleting it: and yet it's not here. I believe I spotted some vandalism coming from you; I might have been mistaken. It's standard procedure to put on a vandal's page: I believe I probably was mistaken. Thank you for bringing this to my concern. -- Split Infinity (talk) 02:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It definitely shows your user ID as having deleted it, but during the last hour or two, the history on lots of articles that I watch has been behaving strangely, and I suspect that has something to do with it: Maybe the database went wacko for a little while (to put it in technical terminology). Wahkeenah 03:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree. Sometimes the history is completely different from what I just viewed a minute ago after I access the history page again. Oh well. -- Split Infinity (talk) 03:14, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I've had that happen from time to time, but it seemed like there was a flurry of it for a little while. I've seen that happen more often with photo postings. I have gotten used to the idea of updates being "immediate", but maybe the reality is that sometimes it can take awhile for the database to catch up to itself. Wahkeenah 03:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * That's probably it: my edits sometimes can take up to a minute to show up. I think it fixes itself by locking the database for one minute or so each day to synchronize things; I ran into this while editing just today. ŞρІϊţ ۞ ĨήƒϊήίтҰ (тąιк 00:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Snow Boarders
hey, didn't you read that NY Times article I linked to? That's verifiable! Systemex 03:42, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Verifiability isn't all of it; Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, after all. That article is not encyclopedic content.

Split infinity?
So, what is infinity divided by 2? >:) Wahkeenah 03:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Still infinity. >:) -- Split Infinity (talk) 04:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmmm... and 0 divided by 2 is 0. So infinity must be 0. Which means the universe collapses into a single point. Yet, here we are. So there must be a flaw in my reasoning. Wahkeenah 04:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism
If you want to investigate vandalism, here's one. At least he's honest about it. But I think he is starting to go around to anything connected with Disney and posting this weird stuff about this obscure (to me, at least) video game. Dig his spelling, too: Wahkeenah 04:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. This is why I want to make a section of my userpage devoted to funny vandalism. Oh, and take a look at his massive userbox section. -- Split Infinity (talk) 04:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrocausality
Hi there, I thought you should be informed about these DRV and afds related to your recent closing of the Retrocausality afd:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Retrocausality_%28Second_nomination%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Retrocausality

You may also want to take a look at the comments on these talk pages:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ScienceApologist#AfD_mess

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bwithh#Retrocausality_AfD_comments

Thanks for your attention Bwithh 07:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Problems with the close
I noticed you both voted in and closed the retrocausality AfD; this is considered inappropriate because of potential conflict-of-interest issues. It is also very unusual to close AfD's early without carefully considering the comments that have been made, and in this case there was one comment that substantially clarified the nomination and thus rendered all the keep votes above in need of reconsideration. There's no harm done, but may I politely suggest that you consider getting a little more experience with the *fD process before you start closing AfD's? Thanks, SCZenz 08:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Of course. Thank you. -- ŞρІϊţ ۞ ĨήƒϊήίтҰ (тąιк) 16:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem. If you ever need any help with anything, please don't hesitate to ask me. :-) SCZenz 17:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to the AMA
Hello Split Infinity, I see that you have decided to join the AMA. I'll be the first to say welcome! We're always in need of more advocates, especially since were backlogged most of the time. Just a few pointers for what we do. We communicate by putting a template on our talk page. The template is AMA alerts. The AMA also has it's own IRC channel, which reports new cases and alerts to us. It can also be used as a place to ask for advice on an issue. If you'd like to jump right into a case, you are free to check out AMA Requests for Assistance, which is our new request for advocacy system. The instructions for how the technical part works is on it's talk page. You can also use the AMA userboxes that appear under here. If you have anymore questions about the organization, just ping any advocate's talk page, including our coordinator Steve Caruso or deputy coordinator Wikiwoohoo. Again, welcome to the AMA! . We're happy to have you on board! You can participate in our current meeting here, where we're discussing our internal policies. All of the members will be happy to help with any queries you have and for "real time" chat, you can go to our IRC channel - full details here. M a rtinp23 20:24, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. -- ŞρІϊţ ۞ ĨήƒϊήίтҰ (тąιк 20:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * You're most welcome - I hope you like it in the AMA :) M a rtinp23 20:32, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I think I will. :D -- ŞρІϊţ ۞ ĨήƒϊήίтҰ (тąιк 20:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Popocatépetl and Iztaccíhuatl
Hi there, I've totally revamped and sourced this article. Please take another look at it if you like, Thanks! Bwithh 06:23, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 18th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Clerk
Clerk duties pretty much work as outlined on Arbitration Committee/Clerks/Procedures. There's really nothing more I can tell you apart from the fact you need to keep an eye on the time and don't close too early. There's a period of 24 hours after the deciding vote in which arbcom members can change their opinion. If you want to become a clerk, the best I can suggest is contacting. - Mgm|(talk) 08:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks! - ŞρІϊţ ۞ ĨήƒϊήίтҰ (тąιк 05:42, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Case Assignment.
Can you take the following Case? Case link thanks Æon  Insanity Now! EA!  01:31, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 26th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:30, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Any reason you changed Michael Gilden's article.?
His article is cited with a reference. There is discussion about it on his talk page and a second, albeit, shorter reference available New Zealand article. Ronbo76 01:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC) My apologies. I was looking at the wrong side of the history column and had you confused with the unknown IP that changed the article. Ronbo76 02:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

TrekBBS
Thank you for your opinions in the TrekBBS AFD. I do not agree with the closing admin's decision and have listed this now under Deletion Review. As you had participated in the AFD, I wished to inform you this in case you wished to voice your opinion on this --Brian (view my history )/( How am I doing? ) 17:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 8th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:05, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi! I'm Ral315, editor-in-chief of the Wikipedia Signpost. It appears that you have not edited in at least three weeks. To avoid spamming your talk page any further, should you be on leave, your name has been removed from the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to continue receiving the spamlist, please leave a note on my talk page to that effect, and I will restore your name, and keep you on the list indefinitely. Ralbot 08:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Neutrality Project
Hi, I'm trying to ensure that the Neutrality Project has not become inactive. If you would still like to participate in it, please re-add your name to the Review Team list. Jame§ugrono 07:51, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Spliting an Infinative
Block quote Why if an infinative is split does it mean loud and bold? Why not the opposite? This is one of those non factual /unresolved theorys of science? I'm confused on the actual meaning of ,To split an infinative means you do, -"What?" Sincerly Abbie

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Interactsidebar.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Interactsidebar.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)


 * }
 * }