User talk:Splitpenny2001

Speedy deletion nomination of Food, Culture & Society


A tag has been placed on Food, Culture & Society, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TopCipher 11:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Splitpenny2001 (talk) 13:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

This page followed exactly the same format & criteria of other academic journals on the topic in the Food portal; in fact, it had more history & credibility as it mentioned the history (1st of its type) & notable personalities on editorial board. Weird that you would delete this & not others. Would have beenb etter to request more historical/notability which could have been added; it was new after all. I have no affiliation by the way.

Splitpenny2001 (talk) 13:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to High-key lighting, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. —EncMstr (talk) 08:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Why are you adding a citation needed tag to a citation?
That makes no sense. Doug Weller talk 14:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Talk:Graham Hancock. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 08:27, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 17:22, 14 December 2020 (UTC)