User talk:Spokesmannuggets

Welcome!
Hello, Greg Efosa Erhabor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Greg Efosa Erhabor, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drm310 (talk) 17:43, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Greg Efosa Erhabor


A tag has been placed on User:Greg Efosa Erhabor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 (talk) 17:43, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

User page
Sorry, but your user page does not conform to Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself or your Wikimedia-related activities. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not a personal website, blog, or social networking site, nor should it be used to promote yourself, or host a fake article, CV/resumé or lengthy autobiography. Thanks. --Drm310 (talk) 17:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU
Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. --I am  k6ka  Talk to me!   See what I have done  19:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Greg Erhabor


The article Greg Erhabor has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This closely resembles advertising article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest
Your edit summary for Greg Erhabor makes it clear you have a conflict of interest as you are an employee of the subject of the article. As such you are strongly advised not to edit the article further. If you are being paid to edit you must disclose this (see WP:Paid editing). QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Greg Erhabor for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greg Erhabor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Greg Erhabor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jcmcc (Talk) 10:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Editing my article
Thanks for the swift reply. While i wait for the deletion discussion on my article, can i still be able to edit the article while the deletion discussion is ongoing. Thank youSpokesmannuggets (talk) 10:35, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


 * You may, however, you might want to leave any editing to other editors seeing as edits by you on that page do constitute COI since you are personally related to the subject of the article. Jcmcc (Talk) 11:56, 9 April 2015 (UTC)