User talk:Spookee

Talk:Nobel Prize in Chemistry
Thanks for your edits to the Nobel Prize articles. Since I noticed that you were modifying the country names, I wanted to let you know that there is currently a RFC about the country data in the Nobel lists. Your comments in this matter would be appreciated! –panda 16:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

The Wi-Fi Case
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Excirial 10:03, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial 10:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial 10:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.
 * Ok, there are warning, and there are warnings. You recieved plenty of time and plenty of warnings regarding your editing of the Wi-Fi article. Even though the vandalism is minor, persistng is just as bad. Excirial 10:50, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

From the revision of wi-fi page: 11:08, 26 October 2007 Spookee (Talk | contribs) (30,906 bytes) (Excirial is trying to suppress my input to 'Questions of Health Risks' and yet claimed my edtis to be acts of vandalism. Report to Wikipedia Management.) (undo)

The reason i keep undoing your edit is because of the continuously returning line "Wi-fi in PSP is cool". This is non neutral point ov view, and was the only edit that showed up in all the diffs. This is the reason why i originally reverted your edit with a friendly wp-vand1 warning. After repeated reverts of my rollback i subsequently upped this to a wp-vand4 last warning, and a report to the wikipedia admins for repeated vandalism.

I think that none of us can really be blamed here. My lupin diffs only showed the malicious line, and not the fact that you made a substantional, quality edit. I think we both kept reverting with the thought that we were right, yet my reverts were based upon partial information.

Last, i would like to notify you that each user has a talk page, where you can leave comments on their behaviour. Mine is here: [Here]. Next time something like this happens (At least with a registered user name) please leave a comment on their talk page. If i would have gotten a heads up after the first rollback i would have immediately stopped rolling back and giving warnings. Still, my apologies for what happend, as the faulty diffs were still the cause of this incident.

With kind regards, --Excirial 11:59, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Aachen Meadows.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:DSCF0359.JPG. The copy called Image:DSCF0359.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 14:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Wi-Fi
No one is attempting to "suppress" any information, they are merely reverting edits that do not improve the quality of the article. If you feel your edits are justified, please discuss them on the talk page first to build a consensus on how best to proceed. Please DO NOT simply put your edits back into the main article (see WP:3RR, and others). Cheers 147.171.255.140 —Preceding comment was added at 10:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi there. I have reported you for violations of the WP:3RR policy. Please see WP:AN/3RR. I will also send you a message with the same content. Yours, Unprovoked —Preceding comment was added at 12:35, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

User RDOlivaw was suspected of sockpuppetry and has been blocked indefinitely. User Unprovoked was suspected of sockpuppetry and has been blocked indefinitely. Spookee (talk) 21:34, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Three-revert rule
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Stifle (talk) 12:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Wi-Fi: Three-revert rule warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. RDOlivaw (talk) 14:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.