User talk:Spookyshit

Your submission at Articles for creation: University of Aberdeen Debater (September 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:University of Aberdeen Debater and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:University of Aberdeen Debater, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:University_of_Aberdeen_Debater Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mcmatter&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:University_of_Aberdeen_Debater reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 13:54, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:University of Aberdeen Debater has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:University of Aberdeen Debater. Thanks! Hammersoft (talk) 18:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: University of Aberdeen Debater (March 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:University of Aberdeen Debater and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:University of Aberdeen Debater, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:University_of_Aberdeen_Debater Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rich_Smith&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:University_of_Aberdeen_Debater reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 19:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Adding on to what Rich Smith said above; I made a comment back in September that there were effectively no references to support notability of this organization. Your response to this, and your only edit to the draft since, was to resubmit it for reconsideration without finding any references to support notability. I strongly urge you to reconsider submitting this for a draft again without finding reliable, secondary sources that support notability of this organization, in line with WP:NORG and WP:GNG. If you don't understand what this means, ask. Simply resubmitting the draft again without doing this work will not result in it being accepted. Also, since your only edits to date on this project have been in support of this draft, I am placing a standard conflict of interest notice below. You need to read this notice carefully and abide by it. If you have any questions, let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 19:18, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, Spookyshit. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:University of Aberdeen Debater, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:18, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:University of Aberdeen Debater
Hello, Spookyshit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:University of Aberdeen Debater, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:University of Aberdeen Debater


Hello, Spookyshit. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "University of Aberdeen Debater".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)