User talk:SpoonLuv

Welcome!


Hello, Ecaftuls, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to do lots more. Some useful pages to visit are:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. We're so glad you're here! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC).

October 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Missing and murdered Indigenous women, you may be blocked from editing. You have no new rationales except your ongoing POV push. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 17:40, 17 October 2019 (UTC)


 * These are not disruptive edits, the content has been questioned by multiple other parties. I provided adequate sourced explanation.  The issue isn't about the validity of the content, but its relevance to the subject and the likelihood of it being misleading when included in the context of the article.  I have included sourced information on the talk page, to which you have just responded with your own point of view.  If you are not pushing point of view, source your information on how these two different crimes are somehow directly related enough to be included in the article without them including any actual references to the subject of the article.  I would be happy to attempt to reach consensus over this matter, but please stop restoring the disputed content until consensus is reached. SpoonLuv (talk) 15:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Who are the other parties? You are blanking sourced content. This is disruptive editing. You are also abusing the templates as one revert is not an edit war. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 18:44, 22 October 2019 (UTC)


 * This content has been removed multiple times, look at the article history. And there's a pretty lengthy write-up from another party on the talk page arguing with this content.  Blanking irrelevant sourced content with sourced reasons why it is irrelevant isn't disruptive editing, but restoring that content while it's actively being disputed on the talk page is disruptive editing.  There is a talk page that allows for people to be able to reach consensus before disputed information is included in the article.  Please make use of it as it is usually the best way to ensure the most accurate and relevant content is present on Wikipedia. SpoonLuv (talk) 17:19, 23 October 2019 (UTC)


 * I saw it as an edit war as this is the 3rd time that you've restored this content. If a disruptive editing template is more appropriate, my apologies. SpoonLuv (talk) 17:19, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

DRN Volunteer Roll Call - Action Required
There has been no roll call since November 2017 so with that said, it is time to clean up the volunteer list. Please go to the Roll Call list and follow the instructions. If no response is received by May 30, 2020, it will be assumed that you no longer wish to participate and you will be removed as a DRN volunteer. Thank you for your attention to this and for helping Wikipedians in their dispute processes. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of CVU Member \ Chat Me Up at 12:08, 16 May 2020 (UTC)