User talk:Spoonman~enwiki

you really don't get to decide what is acceptable sources or not. The fact is that sources must be given. Stop bitching about what sources are there...especially if your going to delete it all.

by the way, take a look at the wikidictionary for the word sarcasm...then take a look at my user page.

then apply those rules to yourself...and you'll just realize you did exactly what i was sarcastically criticizing. (Gibby 03:48, 18 January 2006 (UTC))
 * Gibby, who are you and what are you talking about? This seems a very old coment and I can't find a talk page for user Gibby. I've looked through my contributions and am completely perplexed. Please enlighten me. Spoonman 21:39, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

''Am I the only one who finds this "flag ban" concept to be utterly offensive? If they wanted to prevent any "racial" (I totally object to this description) tensions, then banning the NATIONAL flag might just be the worst thing you could do after banning particular ethno-religious groups from attending. Sorry I just had to get that off my chest, this "race-riots" myth has gone way to far in this country. Spoonman.au'' 23:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * What exactly was a myth: that it happened at all or that they were chanting "go home leb", used the motto "bash a wog day" and were throwing rocks & bottles at, beating and forming 'stomp circles' around anyone they could lay their hands on who looked like they were from the Indian Subcontinent or the Middle East? -- User:LamontCranston 01:17, 22 June 2007 (UTC)


 * LamontCranston, I think you are looking for a different spoonman. Perhaps User:Spoonman.au? Spoonman 13:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * .au...d'oh! My mistake. Bah!

Response to Conflict of interest - editing own page
Hi Spoonman

Firstly please accept my apologies if you feel the article goes against "conflict of interest" policies of Wikipedia, I have edited the article a number of times following similar comments to ensure the article is neutral.

The article is meant to be purely informational and I am not treating this as a spamming exercise.

The words and style of the article has been based on the other similar articles on this subject matter (screen writing software).

Please refer to the Final Draft article you will find similar words have been used:

-- Final Draft is a screenwriting software program designed for writing screenplays, teleplays and Stageplays. It supports both Mac OS X and Windows, and is considered one of two industry standards for screenwriting, the other being Movie Magic Screenwriter. Final Draft has templates for standard film and television script formats, and provides shortcuts for writing slug lines, transitions, dialogue, and action. It also keeps an in-memory list of characters and locations, allowing writers to use tab-completion to speed up their writing. --

The DreamaScript article reads as:

-- DreamaScript is screenplay software aimed at new and professional writers. DreamaScript can be installed on Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. DreamaScript is considered to be an industry standard for screenwriting. Developed in conjunction with IBM and Lotus Notes using corporate standard software. --

I notice that the Final Draft article has been updated since I used it as a template and now states other industry standards, and I think this is a good idea. I can make the updates following any discussion we have.

The remaining article follows pretty much the same format, style and content of other similar articles on this subject matter.

If you have any suggestions on how the article can be updated please respond to this and I will ensure these updates are applied in the interest of following the guidelines of wikipedia.

I look forward to your response.


 * This discussion continues on the Talk:DreamaScript page.

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Spoonman. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Spoonman~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 03:08, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)