User talk:Spopadiin

Welcome!

Hello, Spopadiin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 23:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Digital economics
Your new article appears to be an attempt to publish your own research on the topic. This is not permitted on Wikipedia. In order to maintain Wikipedia as a verifiable reference source, all articles must rely on published sources, not on any one editor's opinions or thoughts on the matter. If this article is your own research, perhaps you should move it to your own user space (perhaps at User:Spopadiin/Digital economics) until you can flesh out the article with reliable sources, or simply request that the article be deleted. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 23:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

RE:new article: References will be updated shortly. It is not my research. Although, It is my observations, as well as for small but sufficient amount of people.

Reference is an acknowledged source of knowledge. However, knowledge itself is not necessary to be created only by those who represent it. From historical point, there are many observations proving it. I am sure everybody can find quite a few examples in wikipedia itself. I like the examples of flat vs. round earth, as much as Einstein relativity theory. Please, support my term preposition and contribute to it with your own knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spopadiin (talk • contribs)
 * I'm not sure what to make of that response. I'm not sure if the answer is unclear because of a poor grasp of English or an intentional attempt to obfuscate the matter.  Your article includes the sentence:
 * I have picked the name "Digital economics" and in the sane [sic] of this same current, "Diginomics" as a short name.
 * This would indicate that you have made up this term, and that you are attempting to use Wikipedia to promote this concept. So, I will ask my question clearly in the hopes of receiving a yes or no answer:


 * Are you using Wikipedia to promote a new concept that you have created called "Diginomics"? WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:46, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Digital economics


The article Digital economics has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Original research verging on something made up one day.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Digital economics has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://wealthofnetworks.wordpress.com/panels/diginomics/. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:44, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Digital economics for deletion
The article Digital economics is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Digital economics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 10:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)