User talk:Sporkbot5000

May 2014
Hello, I'm Excirial. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Ballybogy that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 18:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 19:18, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ballybogy, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ballybogy was changed by Sporkbot5000 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96407 on 2014-05-28T19:23:33+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:23, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

I have noticed that you have removed my statement of scott hickinson and Ben walker being mathematicians and linguists when this statement is very true

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Ballybogy. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:32, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ballybogy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:52, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)