User talk:SportaEda

January 2022
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. -- ferret (talk) 18:45, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Clarification against the allegation of using promotional username.
Respected sir, I would like to draw your attention to the fact that I am new to Wikipedia as a contributor. I wasn't aware of Wikipedia's username policy when I was creating my account and even Wikipedia didn't notified me about the username policy. The username creation notice was for not using the original name. So, I put my username on the subject that came to my mind at that time, without being aware of the promotional username. Now I want to keep my username as my real name if it is possible. And the edit was not promotional as well, i was not asked to edit the cite by any organisation. I happily contributed by myself to Wikipedia when i saw the page needed citation. Kindly review my username issue.


 * Could you explain why a blog site with incomplete templates and a bogus About Us page was "on your mind" at the time, such that you began inserting it as citations? -- ferret (talk) 02:13, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

As a new contributor in wikipedia, I was not aware of all the policies, I will start learning about the policies from now. When I saw the page needed citation I have randomly cited the page without checking the authenticity of the blog site. I apologize for my carelessness. If you allow me I will surely be careful from next time. --SportaEda (talk) 06:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Sir, I have already agreed that I didn't know about WP:RS, WP:CITE in my previous talk, I will learn about these in future. I was experimenting. I could have use sandbox to take permission before doing anything in the site, if I knew about sandbox at that time. I am learning about all these things. I realised I had done something which is inappropriate to the site, I apologize for that. I will be careful next time.--SportaEda (talk) 12:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)