User talk:Sporteditorfast

Welcome!
Hello, Sporteditorfast, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --- Possibly (talk) 18:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello Sporteditorfast. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sporteditorfast. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --- Possibly (talk) 18:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Excuse me very much I am not paid by anyone, I have just created an article in my encyclopedic opinion and now I will go to demonstrate it further by adding other references Sporteditorfast (talk) 22:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * do you have any connection to the subject of the Art Deco week article?--- Possibly (talk) 22:48, 5 April 2021 (UTC)


 * no I'm just passionate about art Sporteditorfast (talk) 07:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * This makes it look like you have a connection, and also the very poor press release sources you added to the article. See also WP:REFBOMBING. I don't think it is notable enough, given the extreme promotional efforts of the festival, so we will have a formal deletion discussion. --- Possibly (talk) 17:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Art Nouveau Week


The article Art Nouveau Week has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "GNG fail. Most sources appear to be paid promotion or non-RS blogs."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --- Possibly (talk) 18:27, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Art Nouveau Week for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Art Nouveau Week is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Art Nouveau Week until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --- Possibly (talk) 17:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Please do not review AfC drafts yet
Hi, you have recently overturned an AfC reviewer's decision to decline an article draft. Please have a look at WP:AFC/P if you'd like to participate, but you currently do not qualify (neither being a reviewer, nor meeting the requirements to become one today) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:38, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Lil Loaded moved back to draftspace after unauthorized reviewing attempt
An article you recently moved, Lil Loaded, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)