User talk:SportingLisboaXI

January 2011

 * I've replied to your message on my talk page. Até logo  Tide  rolls  04:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Turok
Olá, SportingLisboa. I have replied to your message on my user talk but I forgot to address the "links to the Turok Wikia page" question. If you are referring to the English Wikipedia's article Turok (video game), then yes, your contributions are in the article's history and can be found by clicking the "View history" tab at the top of the page. If you are referring to the Turok Wiki (found here), then no, your user page does not link there. I apologize if I may have missed your point. Feel free to explain any mistake on my part. Adeus  Tide  rolls  05:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Looking at your discussion with Greg Salter I believe I need to clarify my position on your Turok content. My replies to your inquiries were not an endorsement of your content.  I apologize if I was not clear.  I was attempting to encourage you into discussion regarding your content.  You did the right thing in contacting Greg Salter to discuss the matter and I laud your polite, good faith manner.  Part of discussion is listening (figuratively speaking, as this is a visual medium).  I do not believe Greg Salter was demeaning your contribution but explaining how the content falls short with regard to Wikipedia's guidelines.  I will agree with Greg Salter,and Qwyrxian who has also expressed an opinion, that content must be notable (see WP:Notability) to be added to the encyclopedia.  To establish notability one must verify (see WP:Verifiability) their content with reliable sources (see WP:Reliable sources).  This does not mean that your contributions have no value, just that the content does not meet the standard for inclusion.  I would hope that you can find ways to help us at Wikipedia by working within the policies and guidelines.  Regards   Tide  rolls  00:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Turok (video game)
I'm not going to move the page back again, but I do recommend that you read Naming conventions (video games), which explains how video game articles should be titled. Turok is not actually named Turok 2008, so should the article's title should not indicate that it is. Reach Out to the Truth 17:37, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

I can't stress enough that there are many Turok video games as you are probably aware of and with the Title of the article just being called 'Turok' maybe directed to the character Turok in the other video games. Do you understand/ The game is called Turok, it was made in 2008 and is a video game. Sorted. It's called Turok 2008 (Video Game) or at least Turok (2008 Video Game). Either way I'm happy, but I'm not happy with it just being called Turok. Many Thanks SportingLisboaXI (talk) 18:01, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Turok (2008 video game) might work, if you can get consensus for it. See Sonic the Hedgehog (2006 video game) for an example where such disambiguation was needed. The important thing is that the game's actual title is properly displayed, which is indeed "Turok". Reach Out to the Truth 18:29, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I'll edit that straight away to Turok (2008 Video Game). I won't bother with the talk page buisness as nobody has used it for over a year. If there is a problem it'll be dealt with on talk pages. Sorry for any trouble. Many Thanks. SportingLisboaXI (talk) 18:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Hello, SportingLisboa. I've come here before answering your message on my user talk just to mention that it's always best to leave a message on an article's talk when you make what might be a major change or a contested change.  Even if there is little activity someone may visit the article and want information about the change.  Tide  rolls  00:37, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

I've responded to your message on my talk.  Tide  rolls  01:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Dark territory bnw.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dark territory bnw.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dark Territory Studios


The article Dark Territory Studios has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Subject is not notable. No references from 3rd party sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:07, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Blake (Talk·Edits) 01:49, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Dark Territory Studios. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 12:26, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * If you click the link that says "Please share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page.", then you get taken to the discussion. Please note our notability guidelines. Subjects must be covered by reliable sources. Right now, there is nothing to cover, because the company is only just started, and a game won't come out for a while. It doesn't need an article. Blake (Talk·Edits) 13:52, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dark territory bnw.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Dark territory bnw.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)