User talk:Sports Rec

Speedy deletion of Underconstruction
A tag has been placed on Underconstruction, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jons63 (talk) 09:30, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. MANdARAX •  XAЯAbИAM  09:33, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Boxx Faxx (2nd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. -- JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 11:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Sports Rec
User:Sports Rec, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sports Rec and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Sports Rec during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 08:38, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Grambling Tyrone Dominique, Jr.
Hi there. I shall leave the decision as to whether or not you are a sockpuppet up to the closing administrator of the Suspected sock puppets/Boxx Faxx (2nd) discussion. As for your user page - you are using it to host information from a deleted page. Feel free to contribute to the Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sports Rec discussion, but be aware that the article about the alleged boxer Grambling Tyrone Dominique, Jr. was deleted following a deletion discussion which you may view (but not edit) here. May I take this opportunity also to remind you that, when you make a contribution to a page with "Talk" in its name (as you did at User talk:JediLofty), you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ). -- JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 11:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Grambling Dominique
A tag has been placed on Grambling Dominique, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Nate1481 08:31, 24 September 2008 (UTC)