User talk:Sportsfan76

Biased revisions
I believe the Wiki content created for this subject is heavily bised, even though some parts were untrue is gives a false impresssion Keys. I will add the Controversy segment later on this evening.Sportsfan76 (talk) 10:08, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Richard Keys
Please reread the comments on User talk:Richardkeysoriginal. They still apply to you, even though you now appear to be using a different account. . . Mean as custard (talk) 09:35, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 12:20, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

An edit to the page which makes a reference to Richard Keys resignation from Sky had been made and yet you still reverted to your original biased version. Everything that has been placed on the page is a fact and does accurately present the work of this professional. Your edit has more than half of it dedicated on an incident that has gone out of proportion. This does neither describe him as a professional nor a personality. In addition should you have wished to make a constructive edit you would have tried to add a sentence to my text which is clearly well laid out, up to date and accurate. Should you revert to your old version, I will naturally assume that you have some kind of interest in defaming Richard Keys.

Sportsfan76 (talk) 14:39, 13 April 2013 (UTC)