User talk:Sportsfan77777/Archive 4

Your GA nomination of Ashleigh Barty
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ashleigh Barty you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 10:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aryna Sabalenka
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Aryna Sabalenka you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 10:22, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 World Snooker Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Allen ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2018_World_Snooker_Championship check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2018_World_Snooker_Championship?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aryna Sabalenka
The article Aryna Sabalenka you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Aryna Sabalenka for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:21, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aryna Sabalenka
The article Aryna Sabalenka you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Aryna Sabalenka for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ashleigh Barty
The article Ashleigh Barty you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ashleigh Barty for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 14:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Daria Kasatkina
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Daria Kasatkina you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 21:21, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Daria Kasatkina
The article Daria Kasatkina you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Daria Kasatkina for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ashleigh Barty
The article Ashleigh Barty you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ashleigh Barty for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 16:02, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Daria Kasatkina
The article Daria Kasatkina you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Daria Kasatkina for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 14:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Kenora Thistles FAC
Hey, I've had Kenora Thistles at FAC for a while now, and am afraid it's going to close without enough action again. As you had reviewed it during the GAC, I was wondering if you'd be interested in taking another look. It would be much appreciated. Kaiser matias (talk) 03:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Sure, I'll leave comments. Though, it might be better if you also asked someone who regularly participates in FAC reviews to help out (e.g. someone who has commented on your previous FACs, or other sports articles). Sportsfan77777 (talk) 03:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks like they archived it on me, which is a shame, as that's the second time now it's happened. I'm planning to put it up for a third (and hopefully final) time in two weeks, I hope you can maybe leave some comments then. And I'll definitely solicit some other reviews prior as well, thanks for the advice. Kaiser matias (talk) 04:25, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kim Clijsters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fila ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kim_Clijsters check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kim_Clijsters?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Talk:43rd Chess Olympiad/GA1
Sportsfan77777, you opened this review over four weeks ago, but have never come back to it. Do you intend to start the review soon? If not, we can make arrangements to delete the page so it's available to be selected by another reviewer. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:45, 3 February 2019 (UTC)


 * I'll probably finish it by the end of next weekend. I started the review in my sandbox, but ran into some issues in the article I wanted to think about. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 00:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kim Clijsters
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kim Clijsters you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Naomi Osaka
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Naomi Osaka you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:41, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Naomi Osaka
The article Naomi Osaka you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Naomi Osaka for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Naomi Osaka
The article Naomi Osaka you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Naomi Osaka for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kim Clijsters
The article Kim Clijsters you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kim Clijsters for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 18:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kim Clijsters
The article Kim Clijsters you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kim Clijsters for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 10:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for all the GA reviews so far. Appreciate you knocking out those three that had been up there for a while! No pressure, but if you are interested in reviewing a couple other similar articles, I have Lee Joannes and Russ Bogda at WP:GAN as well. Cheers, « Gonzo fan2007   (talk)  @ 12:47, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, I can get to those next week. Also, I was wondering if you could help me out and leave comments on Kim Clijsters at WP:FAC. No worries if you can't. Thanks, Sportsfan77777 (talk) 08:05, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I went to check out the nom and it was already passed! Nice work and congrats! « Gonzo fan2007   (talk)  @ 22:39, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stefanos Tsitsipas
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stefanos Tsitsipas you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Matt294069 -- Matt294069 (talk) 03:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Do you want to nominate "Kim Clijsters" for June 8th's TFA?
Hello Sportsfan77777! I was just messaging you since you suggested for the article Kim Clijsters to be nominated for TFA for June 8, 2019 (the birthday of the subject), on WP:TFARP. That sounds like a great idea for a TFA that you suggested; are you going to formally nominate that page at WP:TFA/R? Paintspot Infez (talk) 19:45, 20 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Done. Thanks for the heads-up! Sportsfan77777 (talk) 23:22, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Precious
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, ! Sportsfan77777 (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * A year ago, you were recipient no. 2220 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:27, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, !! I'll use this as a reminder and motivation to make sure my current FAC passes! Sportsfan77777 (talk) 10:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you today for Erin Phillips, "about one of the most decorated two-sport athletes in the world. Phillips is a two-time WNBA champion, an Olympic silver medallist, a FIBA World Championship gold medallist, and basketball isn't even her best sport. Phillips is generally considered the best women's Australian rules football player in the world, having ran away with the league MVP award (the AFLW best and fairest award) twice in her first three seasons."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:06, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alexander Zverev
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alexander Zverev you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 13:21, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alexander Zverev
The article Alexander Zverev you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Alexander Zverev for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 14:21, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alexander Zverev
The article Alexander Zverev you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alexander Zverev for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 06:22, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Lee Joannes
Sportsfan77777, graciously reviewed Lee Joannes for WP:GA and it passed. You had made a comment on similar articles that you reviewed for WP:GA for me though regarding Green Bay Packers, Inc. vs. Green Bay Football Corporation. I was wondering if you would take a quick look and let me know what you would recommend. Joannes is a little different than the other presidents of the Packers, in that GBFC became GBP, Inc. during his tenure. In this instance, I think it is ok to mention both names. Let me know what you think. Thanks, « Gonzo fan2007   (talk)  @ 16:11, 3 May 2019 (UTC)


 * I agree it is a little different. If it were me writing the article, I would say something like, "Joannes owned a wholesale grocery store and was the fourth president of the Green Bay Football Corporation. He helped reorganize the corporation into Green Bay Packers, Inc., the non-profit organization that owns the Packers football franchise." This way, it (1) emphasizes his role, (2) clarifies what Green Bay Packers Incorporated is, and (3) doesn't repeat Green Bay or Packers too many times in one sentence. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 01:08, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stefanos Tsitsipas
The article Stefanos Tsitsipas you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stefanos Tsitsipas for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Matt294069 -- Matt294069 (talk) 03:21, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stefanos Tsitsipas
The article Stefanos Tsitsipas you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stefanos Tsitsipas for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Matt294069 -- Matt294069 (talk) 10:02, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frances Tiafoe
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frances Tiafoe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 15:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frances Tiafoe
The article Frances Tiafoe you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Frances Tiafoe for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 09:21, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Sorry about doing this manually, I believe my edits may cause Legobot issues. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:50, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frances Tiafoe
The article Frances Tiafoe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Frances Tiafoe for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 08:02, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

New message from SounderBruce
 Sounder Bruce  05:30, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Belinda Bencic
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Belinda Bencic you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sofia Kenin
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sofia Kenin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sofia Kenin
The article Sofia Kenin you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sofia Kenin for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 17:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Belinda Bencic
The article Belinda Bencic you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Belinda Bencic for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 08:01, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sofia Kenin
The article Sofia Kenin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sofia Kenin for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 08:02, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Belinda Bencic
The article Belinda Bencic you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Belinda Bencic for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 14:02, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Simona Halep
Hi,

Thanks for your edits at Simona Halep. Can you please now reinstate the 2018 WTA Player of the year of the award? In two places of course. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Machiaveli77 (talk • contribs) 18:39, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Overlap on main tennis articles?
Usually, when we split off a career stats article, the only thing we leave on the main page are singles stats (unless the player only played doubles). Martina Navratilova, Margaret Court, and Billie Jean King were done this way. Why are you bringing over Suzanne Lenglen's charts from her career stats article? They were moved there for a reason long ago. And the only performance timeline should also be singles Grand Slam events (and in her case also a singles World Championship timeline). Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


 * What is that reason? There is no guideline to only leave the singles results on the main page. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 07:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * No specific guideline, true. There are lots of things that aren't specific guidelines. But consensus has been that when we split the article into two, the bulk of prose is on the main page and all the charts are on the statistics page. We require a small performance timeline for singles Grand Slam tournaments on the main page, and also often have the table-ized finals of those same singles Grand Slam events. But not all the other charts. Otherwise why are we creating a statistics page to begin with? We could always merge the two pages back together again. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


 * There is no clear consensus on what to leave on the main page once the career statistics page is created. For different players, it's going to be different. We already double up the "small performance timeline for singles Grand Slam tournaments". That's not a good reason to merge the pages, or avoid doubling info. If you take away the Grand Slam doubles and mixed doubles finals, you're making it look like that player was just a singles player. That's way too misleading. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 08:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * We're creating the statistics page for the full list of titles and finals. You know that. The most important titles and finals belong on the main page. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 08:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * There has been consensus on this for a long long time by usage. I didn't create that consensus, everyone else did. All those mixed doubles charts have always been on the stats page. You need to convince us on the article talk page that they should be there. You have been around long enough to know this. I'll check the project talk page to see if something more specific is talked about. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * We disagree on what the consensus is. You think the consensus is to keep only one performance timeline on the main page depending on whether the player is predominantly a singles player or a doubles player. I think the consensus is to include both the singles and doubles performance timelines, but only when they are each important. We agree on what the consensus is when a player has only had a singles career or only had a doubles career, but disagree on what the consensus is for players that have had both. There are fewer examples of players with both, and most of these examples have not been well-maintained, so it's hard to tell from any example pages. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 08:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Usually, only one performance table is present, this is true. I will admit that Lenglen is a special player... perhaps the greatest of all-time. Most players need only have that single performance table, not the other tables on their main article. So it's one thing to have multiple performance tables for those very special cases, but it's quite another to include all the other tables. That's why we moved that stuff to statistics page. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * However, I compromised on the simple Grand Slam tournament performance charts. She is a special case for those particular charts. The rest of the info really belongs on the stats page. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your review of Steven Matz, much appreciated. And feel free to sign my autograph book. I used to ask people I had positive wiki-experiences with to sign it, but then forgot about it until recently. lol — Hunter Kahn 14:03, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Lenglen 341-7 record
There is no source in the article for the change you made. Sports Illustrated and Tennis Magazine also uses 341-7 and we have confirmation with it in a match by match listing at this moderated website. If the Little book also has a listing can you compare that list to the tennis forum list and see where the discrepancy lies? Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)


 * I have checked that. The discrepancies lie in some of the walkovers mistakenly being counted as wins. The clearest example of this is 1912, when she only played one tournament. She won two matches and lost one, but one of the "wins" was a walkover. So her record should be listed as 1–1 for 1912, but it is listed as 2–1. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 08:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

1921 mixed draw
Dates: August 23–27 Venue: Longwood Cricket Club, Brookline (Chesnut Hill), Massachusetts Surface: Grass


 * The New York Times
 * 1922 Spalding's Tennis Annual, page 87.

Mixed Doubles (Draw=20)

1st Round


 * Eleanora Sears/Willis Davis-bye
 * Alice Jenks/John Nicholl-bye
 * Molla Mallory/Bill Tilden-bye
 * Edith Sigourney/Nat Niles-bye
 * Ann Cole/Sam Hardy-bye
 * Rose Gardner/George Gardner
 * May Sutton Bundy/Robert Kinsey d. Alletta Morris/Lyle Mahan 6-3, 7–5
 * Brenda Hedstrom/Phil Neer d. Marion Fenno/Oswald Turnbull 6-4, 9–7


 * Rosamund Newton/Fred Anderson d. Ceres Baker/Howard Goshall 0–6, 6–2, 6–4
 * Louise Williams/Howard Kinsey d. Katherine Gardner/Henry Guild 7-5, 6–2
 * Mary Browne/Bill Johnston-bye
 * Martha Bayard/Marshall Allen-bye
 * Anna Godfrey/Max Woosnam GB)-bye
 * Jessie Greene/Albert Gore-bye
 * Leslie Bancroft/Howard Voshell-bye
 * Winifred Ellis/Nicholas Reggio-bye

2nd Round


 * Sears/Davis d. Jenks/Nicholl 6-2, 6–0
 * Mallory/Tilden d. Sigourney/Niles 6-3, 6–4
 * Cole/Hardy d. Gardner/Gardner 6-4, 6–4
 * Bundy/R. Kinsey d. Hedstrom/Neer 7-5, 6–1


 * Williams/H. Kinsey d. Newton/Anderson 9-7, 6–4
 * Browne/Johnston d. Bayard/Allen 6-3, 6–1
 * Godfrey/Woosnam d. Greene/Gore 6-2, 6–2
 * Bancroft/Voshell d. Ellis/Reggio 6-2, 6–2

Quarterfinals


 * Mallory/Tilden d. Sears/Davis 6-4, 7–5
 * Bundy/R. Kinsey d. Cole/Hardy 6-3, 6–1
 * Browne/Johnston d. Williams/H. Kinsey 6-4, 7–5
 * Godfrey/Woosnam d. Bancroft/Voshell 6-3, 2–6, 6–4

Semifinals


 * Mallory/Tilden d. Bundy/R. Kinsey 6-3, 8–6
 * Browne/Johnston d. Godfrey/Woosnam 6-4, 4–6, 6–2

Final


 * Mary Browne/Bill Johnston d. Molla Mallory/Bill Tilden 3–6, 6–4, 6–3

Cheers... Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks! This clears it up. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 03:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)