User talk:Sportsplex03

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Sportsplex03. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Everett Stern, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 14:55, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the message, I feel the same about Primefac and NorthBySouth. I do NOT have a relationship to the subject, he was a piece I was working on with a partner for a political science paper. But now I'm just ensuring that the research done is upheld in the encyclopedia entry here on Wiki. Other users who have not studied the subject, have no expertise in the subject area are welcome to commit contributions but should avoid making edits not in line with true research. Thank you NorthBySouthBaronof Sportsplex03 (talk) 17:31, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Your recent editing history at Everett Stern shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 17:34, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 17:51, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * NorthBySouthBaranof, thanks--now I don't have to do it. Drmies (talk) 17:56, 11 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Sportsplex03: Please be advised that this edit violated 3RR. Would you like to self-revert it, so that you are not in violation of 3RR and therefore not subject to being blocked? —C.Fred (talk) 18:03, 11 December 2019 (UTC)