User talk:Sportzluva69

Hello, I'm Gadfium. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Patrick Gower, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - gadfium 03:31, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 08:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Research?? You only have to watch her channel to see she is not far right! Or are you too far to the left to see through your own bullshit? Sportzluva69 (talk) 08:50, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Reply
Please printer the truth instead of your bullshit leftist views! Sportzluva69 (talk) 08:41, 13 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia goes by reliable sources, not first-hand knowledge. Petty insults are a good way to get blocked, also. Grayfell (talk) 08:43, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Reply
Observation, not insult! Sportzluva69 (talk) 08:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Far right
According to The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics, in liberal democracies, the political right opposes socialism and social democracy. Right-wing parties include conservatives, Christian democrats, classical liberals, nationalists and on the far-right; racists and fascists. She is neither a racist or fascist! Sportzluva69 (talk) 09:11, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Patrick Gower. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Bishonen &#124; talk 20:34, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft
I am in the process of drafting a report to file against you for overstepping your boundries by by displaying your political standing! You are disgraceful. Sportzluva69 (talk) 23:04, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
 * That's a baffling thing to say in a new section on your own talkpage. Who are you talking to? Me, for explaining Wikipedia's edit warring rules? Someone else? Bishonen &#124; talk 04:12, 14 July 2019 (UTC).

Alert
Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 03:57, 11 February 2022 (UTC)


 * And adding a reminder that WP:V and WP:BLP are core policies here. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 03:58, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

April 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Laura Loomer, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 12:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC)


 * please stop labelling anyone who doesn't agree with the left as far right! Sportzluva69 (talk) 09:59, 19 May 2023 (UTC)