User talk:Spotty11222

/Archive 1

Pachyrhinosaurus
Yes, P. lakustai is the unicorn species. It was named last summer. The unicorn horn had been known for years, though. ArthurWeasley named and uploaded his image before this species was named. Another user has also notified him of this. J. Spencer (talk) 15:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I wasn't too sure about it. Spotty11222 (talk) 17:22, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Quinze
Hi Spotty11222. Just to let you know, I declined the speedy-delete that you suggested for this article. It appears to be a notable card game. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 22:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Otodus obliquus
Hi. Re Talk:Otodus obliquus, in case you don't already know, to show a change of mind it is usual to strike out the old vote and add the new one, like this:
 *  Oppose Support
 * --Una Smith (talk) 03:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

List of pterosaurs
I've adjusted the column widths (see talk page) does it look any better? Abyssal (talk) 13:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It still looks the same to me. It's just that my eyes aren't what they used to be, and I can hardly read them unless I zoom in manually. It doesn't matter, just a little comment. --Spotty11222 (talk) 22:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Fire Wildfire
Hi Spotty11222, thanks for your note on my talkpage.

Having looked at your original unexplained edit to Wildfire and your explained edit to Fire, followed by your explained revert to Wildfire (and the note on my talkpage), I'm not fully convinced that 'History' is a better section title than 'Origin', but at this point I will not revert your changes.

The relevant Fire and Wildfire articles talk about the 'fire tetrahedron' - oxygen, fuel, heat and a chain reaction are all needed for a fire to take place and continue. The History/Origins sections discuss the build up of the world's oxygen concentration, caused by flora (a fuel provided that the oxygen level is sufficient); and then the fossil record of charcoal (a residue of previous fires). If the section titles 'History' or 'Origin' are to be used, it would be better if they were 'History of fire (wildfire)' or 'Origin of fire (wildfire)', but wikipedia MoS does not like the article title (fire/wildfire, as appropriate) to appear in the section title, so we are stuck with 'History' or 'Origin'. However, the sections are really about the development of the world's atmosphere so as to support (oxygen-breathing) life and as a consequence giving rise to fires. For this reason I don't think that 'History' is any better than 'Origins'. A suitably brief section title along the lines of 'Development of suitable environmental conditions' is needed. At present, I've not yet found a suitable title.Pyrotec (talk) 18:23, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've change both section titles to 'Fossil record'. Thanks for comming up with a consise section title; I was struggling somewhat.Pyrotec (talk) 16:00, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Pelagic thresher image
I removed this image of the pelagic thresher that you uploaded because it's a duplicate of this image, which is copyrighted by wildlife photographer Doug Perrine. If you are Doug Perrine and hold the copyright then I apologize and could you contribute more images? If not, then we can't use it in the article. -- Yzx (talk) 23:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Glad to see this resolved. Thanks for the prompt reply. -- Yzx (talk) 00:13, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Suggestion Concerning Iniopterygians
You think it would be better to redirect Iniopterigians to "Iniopterygiformes" than the other way around?--Mr Fink (talk) 03:27, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I just figured that Iniopterigians is too, shall we say, uncommon a common name for them, and that it would be for the best to put them under the taxon name. Now if I could only identify the iniopterygians I've already drawn.

Edit summaries
Hi Spotty,

Can you use an edit summary when tagging articles with citation needed tags? It makes it a lot easier to see what you're doing without having to compare the diffs. I'd like to keep the dinosaur articles relatively free of maintenance tags; I can do that by adding references where needed, but won't see the tags unless you use an edit summary. Best, Firsfron of Ronchester  22:34, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for moving the Solitaire article back, I thought only admins had the power to move articles to titles that had already been created? That's what it tells me when I try, at least. FunkMonk (talk) 15:21, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: italics
I have never seen any other article, let alone featured content, use such a mechanism. There's really no point to it, and I have to wonder how its implementation holds up on older browsers. -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 13:28, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * And as also pointed out, while the scientific chaps might want it in their taxoboxes, I have not seen any sort of consensus for doing it to other media. I have to agree with many of the posters, it looks damned poor due to the san-serif font. Seeing as apparently the film and video game communities as a whole have not been notified of these discussions, I see no reason to carry it forward. -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 17:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I would suggest starting a discussion at a central location (I guess VP) and then inviting the wikiprojects to give their feedback (WP:VG, WP:FILMS, WP:MUSIC, WP:BOOKS, WP:TV off the top of my head, but there are probably many more). -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 20:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thanks! I think there's a little more to add, and if you don't object, I could submit the DYK? I was thinking of something like ... Limusaurus is the first herbivorous theropod ceratosaur to be discovered in Eastern Asia. What do you think? -- Spotty  11222 10:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * More can certainly be added to Limusaurus. Although I have no objections to submission of a DYK, Arthur did the majority of the work on this article (and also created it), so he should receive the credit for the DYK no matter who submit the actual request. He was actually talking about someone submitting a DYK for this article, so I think he will have no objections to a DYK. Firsfron of Ronchester  14:56, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Tagging
Hi Spotty,

In this edit, you've tagged an article indicating that its lead is too short. However, you could easily expand this lead yourself, summarizing the existing material. I'm not a big fan of maintanence tags, especially where the remedy is so easy. Please consider improving the article instead of adding a tag that will just sit there, possibly for several years. The tag won't improve the article. Best wishes and happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester  13:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hey Spotty! I see you really like dinosaurs and Paleontology, and so do I! I first learned about the fleshy growths on the Pachycephalosaurus from another dinosaur site. Do you know any other dinosaur-realated pages that could use a touch-up? --Dinomaster10231 (talk) 19:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Collecting_shark_teeth_in_the_feild.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Collecting_shark_teeth_in_the_feild.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:21, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Retiring?
Heya Spotty,

Are you really retiring? What happened? Firsfron of Ronchester 19:44, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm so sorry to see you go. I also hope you achieve your dream of becoming a paleontologist (don't listen to your parents, and follow your own dreams).
 * As far as your question goes, I became interested in paleontology as a kid, at about age 5. My cousin gave me a box of around 100 little dinosaur models (this was circa 1980, when they were still usually depicted in the old 'tripod' pose), and I'd spend hours arranging and rearranging them on cardboard platforms in my own 'dinosaur museum'. The saurischians couldn't be anywhere near the ornithischians, I recall. ;)
 * In 1999, I leaped at the chance to study Rana subaquavocalis in its natural environment, as part of my college studies. Amphibians are dying out at an alarming rate, and may well become the fossils of the future. The work I did on R. subaquavocalis, mostly collecting census and temperature data, went into some important papers and expanded my knowledge of herpetology. In 2005, when I saw the huge, very red List of dinosaurs with a thousand red links, I thought, "I can help fill this out; I've got tons of sources". So I began working on WP:DINO.
 * I will absolutely take a look at Feathered dinosaurs, though I try to stay out of that area. It was great working with you, Spotty, and I wish you the best of luck with the Fossil Wiki. Firsfron of Ronchester  21:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Lystrosaurus
Thanks for your help on the article at FAC! --Lystrosaurus1 (talk) 23:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Thx :-)
Hi. Thanks for your good work around here. We need more like you. :-) -- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 13:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Megalodon shark jaws museum of natural history 068.jpg
File:Megalodon shark jaws museum of natural history 068.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Megalodon shark jaws museum of natural history 068.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:33, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Reflist
Hello Spotty. Just curious : what's the difference? Woodwalker (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Paleontology of Galve, Teruel
Is it okay if I merge Paleontology of Galve, Teruel into Galve, Teruel? --I dream of horses @ 18:23, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Pampa de Achala
Hi Spotty. Thank you very much for your contribution in the article Pampa de Achala. For the past 3 years, my work focuses on 'Wikipedia' in Spanish, and my English is not very good, so I am translating with google small paragraphs. Any suggestions or corrections deemed necessary, just do it without talking. Again, thank you very much.Arianzaenglish (talk) 18:15, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Non Free Files in your User Space
Hey there Spotty11222, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Spotty11222/Sandbox. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of files removed today here.


 * Shut off the bot here.


 * Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:01, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Penghusuchus
Hi, Spotty11222;

Thanks for the fix! I'd copied the taxobox from Tomistoma; I'd thought I'd gotten all of the fields, but obviously not! J. Spencer (talk) 15:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Cloverfield monster bug-sm.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Cloverfield monster bug-sm.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/cloverfield-update-fans-draw-the-cloverfield-monster.php. As a copyright violation, File:Cloverfield monster bug-sm.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Cloverfield monster bug-sm.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Cloverfield monster bug-sm.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Cloverfield monster bug-sm.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Cloverfield monster bug-sm.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO talk 18:49, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

United States Bill of Rights has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for June 2011
As one of the editors who has made improvements to the United States Bill of Rights article recently this notice has been left to inform you that it has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for June 2011. The goal this month is to get this article to Good Article standards or better by July 4th, 2011. You can also vote for next months article of the Month or submit a candidate for article of the month here. --Kumioko (talk) 02:25, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:CPT-1980 unidentified allosaurid.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CPT-1980 unidentified allosaurid.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:32, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello Spotty11222! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  01:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Examination of Apollo Moon photographs for deletion (discussion here)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Examination of Apollo Moon photographs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Examination of Apollo Moon photographs (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Shibboleth ink (♔ ♕) 20:21, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Sicklefin lemon shark.jpg


The file File:Sicklefin lemon shark.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)