User talk:Sprays

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Per Ardua (talk) 15:33, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of RGTS
A tag has been placed on RGTS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Per Ardua (talk) 15:33, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

From talk page of deleted article
Well,

I have been working as an intern with RGTS for 12 months, and during this year I have met several hundreds of people really satisfied by the service of this company. 99 % of our customers were satisfied by a service which is often not really appreciated, as removals are often considered as being the best way of being stolen and of having half his stuff broken.

But more than that, we are the only one who proposed a service of European light haulage, the only company proposing this kind of prices for just sending a couple of boxes from England to France, or from Spain to Belgium. A lot of our customers told me that it had been really hard to find a company accepting their transport, and almost impossible to find one with affordable prices (and for a top hand quality of service, even less). I am thus convinced that it is public interest to put this company on wikipedia, as it is offering a unique service and have thousand of satisfied customers (I had, just on my computer 1236 testimonials emails after 11 months in the company, my boss must still have several thousand of them) to prove that it not just a way to advertise for my former employer.

The company starting to become more and more important, it is also a good reason to keep it on this page.

I can answer to any of your questions, queries,... about the company, and more especially about why it should not be deleted.

Please take what I said into account,

Thank you,

Sebastien


 * Sebastien: None of the above assertions appear to be relevant to the central problems with this article; certainly the company exists, and I have no doubt that what you're suggesting is true, but the twin problems are of notability and reliable sources. Simply put, the article has to answer two questions:  "Why is this company notable?" and "What arm's-length expert says so, in a way that can be checked?"  You can follow the links in this paragraph to learn more about these concepts, and I recommend WP:Your first article to your attention as a useful overview of the requirements for every Wikipedia article.  You might also want to look at our conflict of interest policy with respect to writing an article about a company with which you're associated.  Feel free to leave me a note if you have any questions about Wikipedia policy.  Accounting4Taste: talk 22:07, 11 August 2009 (UTC)