User talk:Spriteless

Edit ^^;
I edited but fixed you up a little bit. What do you think? Xavier Valentine 00:38, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

User_talk:Spriteless/Archive <-- Gaia and Pokemon articles are good enough that a mere grammar nazi can no longer improove them much.

Do you mind?
I was wondering if you would mind if I copied your Gaia userbox? I want it...-_-Silver seren 16:16, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! ^_^Silver seren 17:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

I added words on it because it seems better on it. I was wondering why you don't do the same or something to that extent?Silver seren 21:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

That works. ^_^Silver seren 14:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Gaia Online
The gold section had references. Please do not remove content before discussing it with the rest of the people. I would seriously appreciate that.

And why do sections such as the Rally game stay in the article, despise the lack of source? 81.233.5.117 20:10, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I would say don't add content before discussing it with the rest of the people or put something on the talk page about it after you've added it. But, Spriteless can say something, considering its his page...Silver seren 23:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry about that, I'm afraid I was completely out of line. Please continue to be bold], we don't need to discuss things on the talk page before adding them! I just saw a bunch of stuff added, and grouped you in with others who've added lots of stuff that didn't add to the article. It could certainly use a section on the virtual economy Gaia runs, although I don't think anyone calls it the 'Gold System' in particular. It could be easy to source, too, since it's talked about in the articles we already cite. I'll try to put that part back in, it's easy enough to do since nothing is ever purged from Wikipedia without special administrator action. I post this twice because I'm not sure where you'll read it Spriteless 01:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll be quiet then...-_-Silver seren 13:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Sneaky, sneaky. You went and looked that up after I told you, didn't you? Thanks though. Can you tell me an expanded version on what I should do to keep it from being deleted...or at least more specific? I'm working on getting all of the links to be non-red right now.

On that note...JimmyBoi has been blocked from creation, so I can't make a page for it. The admin who did it, User:Jaranda, won't change his mind about unblocking it so I can create a good page...he says that my sources are no good. Any suggestions? Silver seren 01:01, 22 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Well...Bureaucracies are annoying. XD Thanks! I'll see what I can do.Silver seren 17:30, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * On the note of turning it into a category itself, what does that entail?Silver seren 17:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, okay. I guess I won't do anything then. I'll just keep on making them in real links, so even if the list page is deleted, i'll still have contributed something. XDSilver seren 21:12, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Monster Rancher Advance.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Monster Rancher Advance.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:51, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Monster Rancher Advance.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Monster Rancher Advance.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)