User talk:Sprogletto

September 2014
Hello, I'm Davey2010. I noticed that you made a change to an article, First Potteries, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  15:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to First Potteries, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  16:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Men don't care. I actually live where they are based so go and edit your own bus operators page.
 * This is an encyclopaedia so ie we all edit anything and everything .... Also WP:Unsourced states:
 * "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material" and
 * "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed"
 * So I strongly you source your addition or give up otherwise your disruptive behaviour can get you blocked!.
 * – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  16:55, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Get me blocked. I will use TOR.

September 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at First Potteries. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  17:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at First Potteries shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  20:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced content, inexplicably blanking sourced material, and edit warring, as you did at First Potteries. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 20:40, 28 September 2014 (UTC)