User talk:Squanto00

Welcome!


Hello, Squanto00, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Vanjagenije (talk) 14:00, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)

Speedy deletion nomination of Contextual analytics


A tag has been placed on Contextual analytics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, I nominated the article under A11, though in retrospect that might have been a bad call, although it seems more like "patent nonsense" (Wikipedia's description, not mine) than anything else. This article should have gone through WP:AFC instead of being slapped together in a live article. It looks like a neologism, although I did find some legs here but the description, as written, is inaccessible to the casual reader for its heavy jargon. There is also no claim of significance, either outright in the article prose, or with references to support the article.  The language is also confusing for grammatical reasons. "Contextual analytics refers to the skills, technologies, applications and practices for focuses on intentional data aggregation from any machine". The only reference provided doesn't make mention of "Contextual analytics". Those are my notes. I recommend reading WP:42 and finding "significant coverage from independent reliable sources" to establish that the article subject is notable. I would also recommend going through Articles for Creation so you can get the article up to speed before it goes live.  And if there's any way you could make the language more accessible to commonfolk, that would be helpful as well. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:33, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

-->  Hi, I understand, these were words written in a hurry after a meeting with industry analysts and a phd on the topic, probably carried too much of the jargon. However, if you look at the wiki page on business analytics, you will find VERY similar wording... and that page has been approved. Toning down the jargon will destroy the ability of the reader to differentiate what is contextual analytics - the internet of things applied to the enterprise world- but I agree that it might have been better through a staging area. I have a few links and can probably try to tone it down, but would appreciate if we avoid this nomination for deletion of something that is simply a new emerging field within big data?

Nomination of Contextual analytics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Contextual analytics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Contextual analytics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:28, 31 January 2014 (UTC)