User talk:SquattyPottyJockey

September 2011
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:35, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * As a third-party editor to this discussion, I concur with Darkwarriorblake. You are disrupting Wikipedia, and there is a talk-page discussion about this topic. Please desist from your actions, or an admin will be asked to block you.--Tenebrae (talk) 23:44, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * And here is a talk-page comment at Talk:Captain America: The First Avenger that I posted for you to read, and which two other editors commented on. You could have joined that discussion, but instead you chose to edit war. Please read:


 * One of the primary, core policies of Wikipedia is that information must be verified by a reliable-source citation. I'm sure you can understand how an Wikipedia or any other encyclopedia can't just suffice to "take somebody's word for it." Can you imagine what Wikipedia would be like if anyone could make any claim they wanted to without a verifying source? --Tenebrae (talk) 17:45, 12 September 2011 (UTC)}}


 * --Tenebrae (talk) 23:48, 12 September 2011 (UTC)