User talk:Squeakmo3

Jumanji (2016 remake)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jumanji (2016 remake), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.mtv.com/artists/jumanji/biography/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:09, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Dory and Hank the octopus in the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dory and Hank the octopus in the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:06, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dolphin Tale (franchise)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dolphin Tale (franchise) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Enna25 (talk) 03:53, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of COCO Disney Pixar (2017 film)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on COCO Disney Pixar (2017 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Enna25 (talk) 03:54, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jumanji (2016 remake film)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Jumanji (2016 remake film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Enna25 (talk) 03:54, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 04:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Polar Express 2


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The Polar Express 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VQuakr (talk) 04:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

 * I was going to just warn you, but the more I looked at your edit history the more I realized that you remind me heavily of Squeakmore, who was blocked for doing exactly what you're doing here: creating pages for things that do not exist at this point in time or do not warrant an article. You were very, very thoroughly warned about this and told that this was unacceptable, yet you have returned and continue to act in the same manner. Here's a rundown of your articles
 * Jumanji (2016 remake). At this point in time there have been no announcements that this has gone anywhere beyond the company announcing that the movie would release next year. There have been no further announcements surrounding the film since that point in time other than multiple people (including one cast member from the original film) heavily criticizing the idea of a remake. At best this is too soon and there's a strong chance that this may be a "never will".
 * The Polar Express 2. This film does not exist in any stage, from what I can see, other than some fans trying to petition that it get made. I do see that you've tried to add this information to the article with this edit, which has since been removed.
 * Dolphin Tale (franchise). There is no franchise and other than an announcement that there are talks to make a third film and a TV series, there has been no further movement on this.
 * I also need to add that you have edited similar topics as the other account, such as Teen Beach Movie. I'd like to ask that you not edit Wikipedia for the time being because you appear to be doing the same actions that led to you getting blocked in the first place. Given that you've not changed a whit, I have to assume that there is no way that you can change your behaviors with this new account either and I feel that any petitions for an unblock will be as unfruitful as the ones on the old account, which led to Kudpung blocking you from talk page access. I'm actually going to go ahead and do this as well because I honestly don't think that this will be any different.
 * I think that this is probably the first time (or at least one of the very few times) I've said this to someone on Wikipedia, but I really don't think that you should edit Wikipedia and I want you to not return (as an editor) for at least the next 2-5 years. You did not learn anything from the last block and you're doing the same things. At best you're someone who is too young to understand Wikipedia's policies and at worst you're someone who does understand and just doesn't care, but either way you are someone who just shouldn't be editing Wikipedia at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)