User talk:Squigleywa

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Papal infallibility, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Esoglou (talk) 07:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Esoglou. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Papal infallibility because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Removal of information supported by a reliable source will appear to be vandalism. Two cited reliable sources say that Catholic theologians in general hold that the canonization of a saint by a pope is infallible teaching that the person canonized is definitely in heaven with God. You have have cited no reliable source in support of your claim that "sainthood has nothing to do with faith & morals for infallibility"; unless you cite a reliable source in its support, you cannot insert this personal opinion of yours into Wikipedia (read WP:OR). Even if you do find a reliable source that supports your opinion, you can only insert it as one view, without deleting the contrary opinion (read WP:BALANCE), since "'Neutral point of view' is one of Wikipedia's three core content policies" (see WP:NPOV). Similarly, your personal unsupported view that Boniface VIII's declaration "did not fulfill Vatican 1^s protocol for infallibility" cannot be inserted into Wikipedia, and you are certainly not permitted, on the mere basis of your personal unsupported view, to delete from Wikipedia that opposite view, which is supported by a published source. Moreover your edit left an ungrammatical and incomprehensible phrase: "Prior treat of it". Such edits will appear to be vandalistic. Esoglou (talk) 14:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Recent edits to Jovinian
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Mat ty. 007 19:49, 26 July 2013 (UTC)