User talk:Squinonesmillet

Welcome!
Hello, Squinonesmillet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tamar Levine, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! PhantomTech (talk) 03:37, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Tamar Levine


The article Tamar Levine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:Notability and looks like it might be advertising

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PhantomTech (talk) 03:37, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Tamar Levine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamar Levine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tamar Levine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. red dog six (talk) 00:51, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tamar Levine, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. red dog six (talk) 00:55, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Tamar Levine, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. PhantomTech (talk) 04:14, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * You need to Talk. Even editors who might otherwise help and like to keep articles like this won't stand up for an article where an editor is not interacting. I have added cats, Talk banners, wikified a bit and generally helped you. But I don't intend to do further unless you first help yourself a bit here. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:28, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Tamar Levine, you may be blocked from editing. Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:38, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 16:57, 7 February 2013 (UTC)