User talk:Squirepants101/Archive 3

RE: Please do not make personal attacks
yah i know i might not of created the freaking title card but that doesn't mean i didn't create the picture. You obviously don't know the difference between...whatever this is! Get off of my tail. Geez--Chikinpotato11 03:12, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

New Project
Hello I am Driveus, you might recall me for making the camp lazlo episode page. I was wondering if you are interested in helping me set up a new project for cartoon network articles. This includes articles from Cartoon Cartoons, Cartoon Network Studios and of course Cartoon Network. Here is a link Wikipedia:WikiProject:Cartoon Network. Just asking. Driveus 05:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Chacalaca / hoaxes
BTW. In cleaning up after deleting nonsense/hoax/vandalism of Chacalaca, I removed all content contributed by Chacalaca. None of it was sourced. I could not find evidence that any of it was correct information. &mdash; User: (talk) 15:32, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

When to report this user...
When should I report 24.3.247.88 to WP:AIV because this user has received six final warnings, but he/she hasn't been reported yet. The user hasn't vandalised or edited a page since 14:31, 15 March 2007, but I gave the IP another warning. Squirepants101 23:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You could have reported him any time. I have now blocked the IP for a while. Some admins prefer more warnings than others, but six final warnings is overplenty. For this kind of vandalism it can be good to give a couple of diffs too because some of the edits superficially look like they could be legitimate. —Centrx→talk &bull; 00:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi
Hi Squirepants101. I've seen you in a lot of the same articles that I've edited. Since you appear to be a bigtime CN watcher, what are your favorite shows? Black Kat 21:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Block of
I blocked him for creation of a LOT of sockpuppet accounts, including, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,. The accounts were either created directly by Variety Speak Guy, or marked as sockpuppets by. - Mike Rosoft 10:42, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Can I remove a userbox from someone's userpage?
Can I remove the Administrator2 userbox from Mewtwowimmer's userpage because he is not an administrator? He did not a request at WP:RFA. He also impersonated another admin by giving himself a barnstar signed by Glen S. I removed the barnstar from his talk page. Is that also okay?

Here is how he impersonated Glen S.. Squirepants101 20:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, you can remove clearly fraudulent userboxes like that one. The correct place to report this sort of thing is WP:ANI; I have copied your report there. CMummert · talk 21:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


 * You can post to WP:ANI whenever there is a complicated situation that requires administrator attention. If you use this syntax: helpme then it "turns off" the helpme template. I did that when I responded to your request. It ends up looking like helpme. It works for any template. CMummert · talk 21:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I've left the user a note requesting an explanation and that he not do this again. Newyorkbrad 21:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

RE: I found two possible sockpuppets of User:Danny Daniel
Unfortunately I cannot log on at the moment but I will examine the suspected socks when I have the chance. You can always post them on WP:ANI too, so another admin can get to it sooner.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 17:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

I have had it with you, Squirepants101.
Are you insane?! Why are you reverting all my long-researched facts? WHY? Mewtwowimmer 23:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

List of the Oldest People
Squirepants101, in regards to your 'merging' of 'List of the Oldest People' with 'Oldest People,' first off, I don't think less than 24 hours is enough time to build a consensus. Second, I think most people agreed to a 'merge' but what was NOT clear was which way to 'merge' these articles. I thought you were going to 'merge back' the 'List of the Oldest People' article into the 'Oldest People' article. Note the 'Oldest People' article was constructed originally to be a collection of lists of the oldest people. I disagree with using the 'List of the Oldest People' moniker...it is NOT one list, it is MANY lists.→ R Young {yak ł talk } 23:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Further, the 'Oldest People' list has worked fine for a long time. the 'List of the oldest people' article was actually started around March 9 2007, with the purpose of mirroring the GRG lists of the oldest people ever (1 to 100 or whatever). As such it was not a reduplication because the "Oldest People" list just had a 115+ category (very top of the list). I think the idea of a longer list in a separate article was not all bad. I think killing the main article is wrong, as the main article's purpose is to provide a summary of the very oldest persons. Mr. Versieck messed up both by first changing the 'list of the oldest people' into something that mirrored the main 'oldest' list (some sort of ego thing, he likes to control everything, even if it is wrong). The result is that a lot of work by someone got tossed in the trash. I suggest a re-opening of the debate, as it was not clear which way to 'merge'...→ R Young {yak ł talk } 23:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for being reasonable. I have added a link on the "Oldest People" list #2 ("Among the Oldest Ever"). Note that the "Oldest People" list only has a top-23 and the other one has a top-80. To merge would create too much for one article. I also suggest we could pare the "Among the Oldest Ever" list to just a top-10 format. Comments?→ R Young {yak <span style="font-family:arial, helvetica;">ł <span style="font-family:arial, helvetica; font-size:x-small;">talk } 00:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

I just want to be an administrator.
You do not know that I can see what you can't. I've been using Wikipedia for 2 years under 2 account names! I was Kathywimmer! I'm sorry! Mewtwowimmer 23:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Mewtwowimmer's RfA
Its not currently transcluded on WP:RfA so its effectively dead. There's no particular reason to do anything more with the RfA page itself unless people start to add to it. If that did happen, I'll formally close it. Gwernol 00:10, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

RfA
Hi there;User:Gwernol is only partially available at present. But he has removed the malformed RfA you mention, so no action is necessary.--Anthony.bradbury 00:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Mewtwowimmer
I think he's just trying to sound big and powerful, but doesn't understand how that works. :) &mdash;tregoweth (talk) 02:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

MiszaBotII archived my unresolved entry at WP:ANI
Squirepants101 14:32, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I'd suggest re-entering it at ANI and writing that you have had to re-add it and hopefully and admin will comment on it then! Hope this helps!  Te ll y a ddi ct  14:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not vandalise my userpage in the info section
Read the title. FictionH 18:01, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

FictionH
I agree with you that FictionH should be reported. Atomic1609 21:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Threats and such
Had I thought for a moment the user was making serious threats, the block would've been indefinite. Still, they're not appropriate, and the vandalism is certainly not acceptable. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks a bunch for reverting vandalism on my user page! :) --Aiyda 17:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

A comment that violates Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
I have tagged the article List of characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy for clean-up because much of it is written in an in-universe perspective. I notified other users about this and here is the comment I received: ''I don't think there's any way you can write this article in any other fashion. Where are the references supposed to come from? Fan pages? The information in this article is based on osmosis from watching the show, by a group of fans who generally agree on what's published here. Sources would be nice, but they do not exist, other than the already linked to interview with Danny Antonucci, and the sparse character bios on cartoonnetwork.com. Fan pages are based on self research and often contain many errors. A dedicated group of fans have worked constantly to keep this article clean of fancruft, vandalism, and inaccuracies. If you can find sources for these facts, then by all means link to them. As such, I think the tag is in error, and I will remove it in 3 days if you can't produce any sources.'' Can someone remove a clean-up tag after only three days (if the article hasn't improved)? I know this violates several policies, but does the "osmosis from watching the show" violate anything? Finally, how should I reply to comments like this? Squirepants101 01:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I suppose they could cite from the quotes in the TV show??? Final Fantasy VII cites directly from the quotes in the video game, and it's a WP:FA.  Tuxide 01:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants April 2007 Newsletter
<div style="border-bottom:1px solid #abd5f5; background-color:#d0e5f5; padding:0.2em 0.5em 0.2em 0.5em; font-size:110%; font-weight:bold;">

<div style="border-bottom:1px solid #abd5f5; background-color:#d0e5f5; padding:0.2em 0.5em 0.2em 0.5em; font-size:110%; font-weight:bold;">

List of Spongebob Squarepants episodes
I think this list was better without screenshots. If we plan to re-add them:


 * make a sepreate section for them.
 * add the screenshots but remove all tittle cards, combing them is silly.
 * just keep the article with the tittle cards, they make the article way better.

If you continue, I will put up this article for deleation or at least re-name it, so you, or anyone else will have no access to it. How I would want it was:

!! Episode # !! Episode Name !! Tittle card !! Screenshot !! Episode discription

Hope you do it. (Superjustinbros. 11:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC))

Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Please vote on deletion of Ed, Edd, and Eddy character pages
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_%28Ed%2C_Edd_n_Eddy%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edd_%28Ed%2C_Edd_n_Eddy%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddy_%28Ed%2C_Edd_n_Eddy%29

Thanks. -- Elaich 02:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Ok, whatever. I was just messing with my roomate. No reason to be a dick about it. However, Cyclops, has never graduated from OSU. Look it up. I changed that because the title said Alumnus. Therefore you have officially contributed to false wiki information. Congratulations. Also, Chris Rhoades is in no way famous. I am guess you could find more links googling my name than his. He is also kind of a douche bag. That is why I made that edit. In any case, I am not sure why you give a damn what I put on a page about OSU greeks, but if you really care about accuracy you would have only changed the part about Ryan Oss.

I need assistance with a report at WP:ANI
Is it normal for a report like this to not be looked at for almost a week? Especially if it's a sockpuppet report? I've had a similar problem with an earlier report. It was looked at only because I told an admin about it. Squirepants101 01:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I've seen your request, but I'm no admin either so I'm no help. I put a message to IRC, we'll see if that helps.  &#10154; Hi DrNick ! 02:01, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't think that worked because Ranapanna is still editing. He is trying to add his hoaxes and misinformation and is currently adding the vandalism to List of characters from My Gym Partner's a Monkey, which I've been reverting. Squirepants101 04:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This is one of the downsides of working on a website on the internet. Things get kept for a while. Don't worry, its happened to me loads of times, its just because everyone is busy doing whatever they do. Just sit tight and someone will eventually reply, but you have to be patient. I know, its very annoying :D. Grover 11:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

pages created by banned users
There is a speedy criteria for this: G5,. Natalie 17:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * As far as your message above, is the editor still unblocked? Natalie 17:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Danny Daniel and sockpuppets
I have blocked User:Ranapanna as a probably sockpuppet, but I was wondering if you could create a usersubpage explaining Danny Daniel's MO in the event that he creates another sockpuppet. IMO this will make it easier to explain why somone should be blocked, which might mean the account gets blocked faster. Natalie 17:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

I am getting pretty sick and tired of you following me around and leaving snide comments on others' talk pages. If you want to communicate with me, please do so on MY talk page. I hate to say this, but you are beginning to show signs of becoming a NetNanny or NetKop. You seem more concerned about holding people to a fine line of compliance with niggling rules and regulations than the content of pages, or making viable edits. I wonder why it does not seem to bother you at all that these stubs do not meet Wikipedia guidelines to exist, but my efforts to do away with them seem to be a major concern. to you. Once again, I am getting tired of it. -- Elaich 13:43, 20 April 2007 (UTC)


 * You've made me so angry and stressed that I've decided to take a Wikibreak for two days. Good bye. Squirepants101 03:04, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * And you made me angry and stressed also. It goes around both ways.-- Elaich 09:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

You haven't taken a Wikibreak at all, have you? "Contribs" shows that you have been editing all along. Good faith, eh? -- Elaich 10:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * So I came back early. What's wrong with that? I started to edit again when I calmed down. Squirepants101 16:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Not a thing. I never wanted you to go to start with. Welcome back. -- Elaich 18:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * As of right now, I am officially not speaking to you. You stress the rules of civility at every turn, but talk behind my back on the talk pages of others, and spread unfounded rumors. If you continue this vendetta of yours, I will take it to the admins. -- Elaich 21:22, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


 * It's plenty. I am going to take a Wikibreak, at least from this article, to let things settle out. Apology accepted, I would like to apologize to you for being intolerant. -- Elaich 02:25, 24 April 2007 (UTC) -- Elaich 03:12, 24 April 2007 (UTC)