User talk:Squirrelsniffer

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Laramie, Wyoming. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''Please do not remove a cited section in an article without commenting why on the talk page. Regardless of if there is a page about the subject, and regardless of your opinions on the subject, it did put Laramie on the map, and was reported widely in the national (and international) news. They even made a film and play about the subject. '' milonica (talk) 19:51, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Use of proposed deletion on The Miracle at the New Meadowlands
Hi,

I've noticed that you have repeatedly added a prod tag to The Miracle at the New Meadowlands. That article has previously been discussed at Articles for Deletion, and articles that have been discussed at AFD are not eligble for deletion by the proposed deletion process. Furthermore, anyone is free to remove a prod tag, and once it is contested the article is no longer eligble for deletion by proposed deletion. For both these reasons, that article can no longer be deleted by the proposed deletion process. Please stop adding the prod tag back onto the article. Whether or not the article went into too much detail is a separate matter. I would recommend starting a discussion on the talk page for the article to come to a consensus about how detailed it should be, as people are likely to keep reverting you if you remove large amounts of content without discussing it. Calathan (talk) 00:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Your attitude to your fellow editors, as evidenced by your history, doesn't give me any confidence that you are here to contribute constructively or collaboratively. It doesn't help that you blank your talk page, and although in strict terms, you are entitled to do that, it shows an intention to hide perfectly valid feedback from view. Also, your continued addition of "black" to some biographical articles tends me to the opinion that you are not fully in tune with our values here, and to prevent further offence and violation of neutrality policy, you are blocked until you can provide valid reasons why your continued editing here is in the best interests of this encyclopedia.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu  01:11, 6 February 2011 (UTC)