User talk:Srabantisofc

September 2013
Hello, I'm Jayantanth. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone, to Srabanti Chatterjee because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! - Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 09:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Srabanti Chatterjee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''Please don't add external links like face, blog etc .. see WP:EL'' - Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 10:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Srabanti Chatterjee with this edit. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 10:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Srabanti Chatterjee with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 10:29, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Srabantisofc. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 19:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)