User talk:Srawling

Speedy deletion of PIPC Global Management Consultancy
A tag has been placed on PIPC Global Management Consultancy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 15:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Contesting a speedy deletion
In order to contest a speedy deltion, you add the hangon to the article, not your own talk page, and explain why it shouldn't be deleted on the article talk page. In any case, there is no point adding hangon templates now, because the article has been deleted. Mayalld 13:38, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

PIPC
one hangon template is sufficient, and you should NOT add messages about your intent to edit the article soon to the article page. Leave it to be deleted, and start afresh with a decent article. Mayalld 14:12, 15 November 2007 (UTC)