User talk:Srdaly

Please know that I have seen the December 18 "citation needed" flag you inserted in the top portion of the article on general semantics -- a flag following a sentence I wrote that purports to summarize the evaluation of general semantics by "most recognized specialists" in the scientific fields important to Korzybski. I consider your flag totally constructive and appropriate -- thank you --, but, pressed by other immediate occupations, I need a little time to find a suitable source or suitable sources to cite. Please be patient at least until mid-January. Best Regards, Canhelp (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

P.S. - Earlier, I posted the same message you are reading here to User:Srdaly

I have rewritten the sentence you flagged with "citation needed." Also, I asked Wikipedia administrators to delete my erroneous post to your user page, and they obliged. If you wish to enter into dialog with me concerning the general semantics article, I welcome that. Regards, Canhelp (talk) 16:07, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Explanation of edit made today to article on general semantics
Hi. In December 2011 you significantly expanded a subsection ("Extensional devices") in the Overview section of the general semantics article -- you inserted several sentences of Neil Postman material. I felt it was more structural consistent here to place your Postman reference in a footnote. In this subsection, if you will check the footnote following the naming of Hayakawa, I think you'll agree that the intent in the subsection is to emphasize that extensional devices are NOT to be applied solely or even primarily at the verbal level. If you care to enter into dialog on this or other aspects of the article, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. Canhelp (talk) 15:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)