User talk:Sredina

Sources say he was elected prime minister, not prime minister-designate. Can you provide the reference that he officially becomes a PM when the government is confirmed? --Tone 13:49, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Miro Cerar was elected on 25 August 2014 but took office together with ministers on 18 September 2014. Alenka Bratušek was elected on 27 February 2013, but took office on 20 March 2013, when government was confirmed. ...the same goes for all other Prime Minister

Law: Zakon o vladi RS

Paragraph 3, Article 11: "Šteje se, da je vlada nastopila funkcijo, če je imenovanih več kot dve tretjini ministrov, pri čemer se ne vštevajo ministri brez resorja. Predsednik vlade mora v desetih dneh po nastopu funkcije vlade predlagati še neimenovane ministre, oziroma obvestiti Državni zbor, katere resorje bo začasno, vendar ne dlje kot za tri mesece, prevzel sam ali jih poveril drugemu ministru."
 * True, this relates to the beginning of the cabinet term, not the PM. Today, PM was already sworn in. Has this changed? IMO we should change for Cerar as well. --Tone 13:59, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * See for example: "40-letni Šarec je z današnjo izvolitvijo postal deveti predsednik vlade, medtem ko bo njegova vlada, če jo bo uspel dokončno sestaviti, 13. v samostojni Sloveniji. " --Tone 14:00, 17 August 2018 (UTC)


 * He is Prime Minister-Designate (mandatar), which means he has to form government now. Until then, current government is still in office, incuding Prime Minister Cerar. Šarec cannot be Prime Minister without cabinet (ministers). He has no power at the moment, only mandate to form government.
 * It's the same situation as with U.S. President-Elect, he is President, but has not power until he takes office on 20 January, until then seating President has all power.
 * I understand your point but then all the sources are wrong ... That's why I am asking for a detailed reference. The law you cite is about the cabinet, not the PM. --Tone 14:24, 17 August 2018 (UTC)


 * No, the source i stated is for government as a whole. According to article 110 of Constitution ("Vlado sestavljajo predsednik in ministri. Vlada in posamezni ministri so v okviru svojih pristojnosti samostojni in odgovorni državnemu zboru."), government consists of Prime Minister and ministers, they all take office at the same time - when government is confirmed in the National Assembly. Once again, Marjan Šarec is Prime Minister-Designate, so he has to form government now, if he fails he will not take office at all. So country cannot be without government (logic). Cerar and his 12th Government remain in office, until new, 13th Government (Šarec Cabinet) is elected - meaning that at least two thirds of ministers is elected.
 * And no, sources are not wrong, he was elected Prime Minister, but won't take office until he forms the 13th government.
 * Ok, the constitution is a better source. Though this means that the media get it wrong, they say he became the PM :P --Tone 14:34, 17 August 2018 (UTC)


 * No, they don't, you have to understand the difference between Prime Minister and Prime Minister-Designate. One officially becomes Prime Minister, when he gets his government elected, until then old government has all powers.
 * Anyway, I think we solved the problem with the timing of the update. --Tone 14:38, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Seniority of the 8th National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Seniority of the 8th National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. lovkal (talk) 12:00, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of bilateral meetings of the Speaker of the 8th National Assembly for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of bilateral meetings of the Speaker of the 8th National Assembly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of bilateral meetings of the Speaker of the 8th National Assembly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 15:02, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Minister of Foreign Affairs of Slovenia
Hello, Sredina,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Minister of Foreign Affairs of Slovenia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains}} and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains (talk) 01:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Members of the Committiees of the 8th National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia


Hello, Sredina. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Members of the Committiees of the 8th National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:54, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Seniority of the 8th National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia


Hello, Sredina. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Seniority of the 8th National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 20:56, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Wrong picture
You put the picture for Spain Prime Minister of Spain wrong. It's Antonio Costa from Portugal !! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CuteDolphin712 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

I did what and where?? --Sredina (talk) 18:05, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

President of the European Commission
Rather than argue it out in the article space, I have opened a discussion at talk:President of the European Commission. If there is a consensus in your favour, I will be happy to concede. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 11:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I have assumed that you would know that WP:BRD is BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, which invites editors to wp:BEBOLD but also to accept that others may not agree and thus bold changes may validly be reverted so that they can be discussed. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 11:16, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Ninth European Parliament
Fantastic work you've been doing there! Moscow Mule (talk) 00:03, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ninth European Parliament, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francisco Guerrero ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ninth_European_Parliament check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ninth_European_Parliament?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:38, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Von der Leyen Commission, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Claiming someone has been nominated as a Commissioner needs a reliable source to confirm it. Just because they serve on the current Commission does not mean they will serve on the next. And you should be aware that other Wikipedia articles are not a viable source for making such changes. Feel free to reinstate those names you can provide a reliable source for that confirms that they indeed have been chosen to serve on the next Commission. But if you continue to revert without discussion or fixing the problems that lead to the removal, you will sooner or later have to face sanctions for edit-warring. Regards'' So  Why  10:11, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Reverted edit
Hi! Why did you revert my edit? --Glentamara (talk) 14:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * You just added names and link in the same cell.Sredina (talk) 16:04, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes..? That was no reason to revert it. You could have just formated it as you liked. --Glentamara (talk) 15:08, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I just automatically did it. It doesn't really change anthing tho.Sredina (talk) 15:22, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Your addition to Von der Leyen Commission has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Return the text and delete what you think is coppied, cause not everything was, and some things, such as names for legislative proposal, can only be coppied, you cant just make something up, and a lot of stuff in there was legislative proposals names. Sredina

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Von der Leyen Commission; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. So  Why  16:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Conte II Cabinet moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Conte II Cabinet, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  14:44, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

2019 Bled Strategic Forum moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2019 Bled Strategic Forum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:57, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ninth European Parliament
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ninth European Parliament you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Fiamh -- Fiamh (talk) 02:01, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ninth European Parliament
The article Ninth European Parliament you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ninth European Parliament for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Fiamh -- Fiamh (talk) 03:01, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

14th Government of Slovenia moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 14th Government of Slovenia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me after replying off my talk page 13:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:2019 Bled Strategic Forum concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2019 Bled Strategic Forum, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2019 Bled Strategic Forum


Hello, Sredina. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2019 Bled Strategic Forum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:35, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

14th Government of Slovenia
Could you help me with the references format? I nominated the article for ITN.--Tone 14:38, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Coronavirus
Thank you Jon698! - Sredina (talk) 11:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Politics of Slovenia
Hi.

I didn't say memberships are not notable, but that we couldn't have them where they were—in fact I left them in the section "Foreign relations". Putting international organizations there means that, for every country in the world, we would have to put at the beginning of the template, even before the Laws of the country, all the names of boards and associations the country is part of, such as "Organization of American States", "Mercosur", "Commonwealth of Independent States", "ASEAN", "United Nations", "African Union", "Entente Cordiale", "Axis of Resistance", "Arab League", "Warsaw Pact", "Union of South American Nations", "BRICS", "PROSUR", "Group of 8", "of 7", "of 20", "of 4", and so on. You too understand that it would look more as an endless shopping list then a succinct overview of the country politics.

You say some memberships are relevant, but where to draw the line between relevance (leading to a portrayal at the top) and marginality (leading to a concealment from eyesight)? To me the EU is really not relevant at all, we would surely be better off without it—let's leave it in the last section of foreign relations.

P.S: I was not talking about the relationship between the powers of government (e.g. executive, etc.), but about the sources of law, which everybody who wants to, knowns the basis of (and they are two very different things). --Foghe (talk) 10:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:14th Government of Slovenia


Hello, Sredina. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "14th Government of Slovenia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:07, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Map - Party affiliations in the Von der Leyen Commission members
Template:Map - Party affiliations in the Von der Leyen Commission members has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 20:15, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Map - Von der Leyen Commission members by gender
Template:Map - Von der Leyen Commission members by gender has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 20:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:EU Foreign Affairs Council Members
Template:EU Foreign Affairs Council Members has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 15:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Map - Party affiliations in the EU Foreign Affairs Council
Template:Map - Party affiliations in the EU Foreign Affairs Council has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 15:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:List of High Representatives of the European Union
Template:List of High Representatives of the European Union has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 18:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve 15th Government of Slovenia
Hello, Sredina,

Thank you for creating 15th Government of Slovenia.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains (talk) 17:54, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

9th National Assembly of Slovenia moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 9th National Assembly of Slovenia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  07:14, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:9th National Assembly of Slovenia
Hello, Sredina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:9th National Assembly of Slovenia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:9th National Assembly of Slovenia


Hello, Sredina. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "9th National Assembly of Slovenia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC)