User talk:Sreehari sharma

March 2018
Hello, I'm Qzd. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kurukkal, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Qzd (talk) 17:16, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Please be aware
Since you are still making poor contributions, I think you need to be made aware of the information below. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 15:34, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Sreehari sharma. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Sitush (talk) 15:36, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Wikistarndards

 * Your sources are to be cited in accordance with the standards of Wikipedia.-Wikimankerala (talk) 12:33, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kurukkal. Sitush (talk) 19:36, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  08:50, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Kurukkal
After twice being reverted since your block, your third edit was this. You have posted that to the wrong place - you need to create a report at WP:DRN - but in any event it will go nowhere because you haven't even followed the first step of dispute resolution, which is to discuss the issue on the talk page of the article.

For what it is worth, you don't have much chance there, either. As my comments there point out, you are trying to run a coach and horses through our policies just because you disagree with something. You can't do that and the source does indeed refer to the information that you do not like. Your only hope would be to get consensus that the source in question is unreliable and I doubt that will happen. - Sitush (talk) 06:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yunshui 雲 水 08:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC) It's very clear from your last few edits that you have no intention of trying to understand or comply with Wikipedia's policies and processes. Your behaviour is disrupting the operation of the encyclopedia, and you will not be permitted to edit again until we are convinced that you understand and will abide by the site's guidelines. Yunshui 雲 水 08:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Block
Sir No i know you give importance to rules only you does not care about the contents. When i raised a serious concern you were refusing in intervene. Now when i removed false information and insultive comments you are acting against me. Sir, please do remember that this insults a community. This time i will not request to lift the block. But just remember, you could make me scilent by blocking, but the truth will continue to flow. Our God lord Srikrishna once said about this yuga (the present time is kaliyuga according to hindu mythology) that in kaliyuga the truth may not win always but it will resonate till the truth wins. I expected that as an organaization Wikipedia will look into my concerns. Now I understands that Wikipedia gives priority to its Policies not to the truth. I would like tell you that policies should be favourable for the truth to grow otherwise the policies should be thrown into the ocean. With regards Sreehari Sreehari sharma (talk) 17:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:TRUTH. We cannot simply take your word that something is "true", nor can you simply assert something is "true" and expect other editors to fall in line.  You must discuss the issue.  You have to be able to prove it with a reliable source, or demonstrate why the existing reliable sources are inaccurate.  If you cannot or will not do that, then yes, you should not participate here.  This is a collaborative project with people from all over this planet. You have to be able to collaborate and follow the policies and guidelines that have been laid down. 331dot (talk) 17:43, 8 June 2018 (UTC)