User talk:SrijitaK

Welcome
 Hello SrijitaK, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
 * Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

---SPat SrijitaK, good luck, and have fun. -- S Pat   talk 21:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Wigner map revert in Density matrix
Hi, and welcome; perhaps we could discuss this more, but the point of the wikilink to Weyl quantization is so as to have some reference/explanation whatever of the meaning of the Wigner and Weyl maps that are inverses of each other, and are not fully accounted for in the Wigner quasi-probability distribution article. Otherwise, the Wigner transform of the von Neumann equation would appear obscure, and would lead to disturbing misconceptions rampant even in the penumbra of the literature! Perhaps, if you have the time and attention to lavish on the subject, you could go ahead and shape good explanations for the Wigner/Weyl map inverse relationship, etc.... Most people in the community overcome the misleading naming of "Weyl quantization" and quickly appreciate it is a systematic equivalent change of representation, and not really a "quantization", and never look back... But it would be nice if you added explanatory material for the general reader, instead of removing such. Cuzkatzimhut (talk) 14:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)  Logically, such explanations would belong to representations of the Heisenberg group, but that article is a bit top heavy... See what you could do! Cuzkatzimhut (talk) 14:54, 9 February 2012 (UTC)