User talk:Srikeit/archive 2

Munaf Patel
Hello Srikeit. He can't have done 48 overs, he's only played one ODI. did you mean 48 balls? Regards, Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC).
 * Sorry, I should have checked more carefully. Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:23, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Stadia
I'd created the stubbed articles so that ALoan's featured list would have all blue links for Indian stadia. The infobox could be jazzed up a bit. There's too much of bold text, some padding needs to be added and bulleted lists could be introduced. =Nichalp  «Talk»=  07:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * See the template in use for Indian states. User:Saravask had designed the new templates. Regards, =Nichalp   «Talk»=  08:20, 4 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Srikeit, There is a template for the stadiums already. It is Infobox Cricket Ground. Please use that instead of creating a India specific one. - Ganeshk  ( talk ) 15:53, 4 April 2006 (UTC)


 * You can see its usage at Sydney Cricket Ground. - Ganeshk  ( talk ) 15:54, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

NUST
Hi. I had already seen the photo when you added it as NUST is on my watchlist. Though the photo is nice, it is a bit blurred. I am planning to take a few pics this week as we have a cul-fest at college where I'll be taking my camera. I have not yet expanded the article yet because of a 2 reasons - 1) I am currently busy with the Ahmedabad article (I also noticed the links you added there in the media section) and also with reverting vandalism. 2)Loyola is something very close to my heart. I can never generate that much affection for Nirma.

But whether I like Nirma or not, that article is certainly going to be improved by me soon. I think I will be able to contribute at the current rate only for a week now. Then I have exams. From May 6 onwards I plan to set wikipedia on fire with my edits. One of my top priorities is to get Ahmedabad article to FA status. Do take some pictures of Ahmedabad like you did for Nirma.

Anyways, it is getting really late, and I have to go to college tomorrow. - Aksi_great (talk) 19:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof
Thanks for your interest in VandalProof! You've been added to the list of authorized users, and I will do my best to notify you once a download becomes available. AmiDaniel (Talk) 03:06, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

A Download Is Now Available
I just wanted to let you know that a download of VandalProof has recently been made available. AmiDaniel (Talk) 09:51, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Happy Easter!
Please put all tasty Easter wishes here!



VandalProof 1.1 is Now Available For Download
Happy Easter to all of you, and I hope that this version may fix your current problems and perhaps provide you with a few useful new tools. You can download version 1.1 at User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof. Let me warn you, however, to please be extremely careful when using the new Rollback All Contributions feature, as, aside from the excessive server lag it would cause if everyone began using it at once, it could seriously aggitate several editors to have their contributions reverted. If you would like to experiment with it, though, I'd be more than happy to use my many sockpuppets to create some "vandalism" for you to revert. If you have any problems downloading, installing, or otherwise, please tell me about them at User:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs and I will do my best to help you. Thanks. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:50, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Watch what you're reverting please
This was a legit edit; though he didn't revert fully, he shouldn't have been reverted. BTW, your pic in your /haha page may be deleted in 7 days if you don't provide a source and license data -- Rory 0 96 (block) 17:22, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Revert
Why did you revert the anon's meaningless talk page comment, but not his article vandalism? Raul654 17:56, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

My user page
Thanks. JoshuaZ 03:30, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your message
Heh, no problem. There can't have been much of a time gap between our reverts, we both warned him at the same time ;) Adrian(Talk) 06:05, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for doing that. My exam prep is going fine. It is very difficult to stay away from wiki (am trying hard). Just making 1-2 edits here and there, no major contributions. - Aksi_great (talk) 07:11, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Nelson-800x600.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Nelson-800x600.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:05, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

1000
Congrats on getting to 1000 edits. Have an ice-cream. Visit User:Interiot/Tool2 for your current edit-count. - Aksi_great (talk) 06:15, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome back!
Welcome back from your WikiBreak. —    nath  a  nrdotcom  ( T •  C  • W) 00:21, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Changes in Teeing ground
I made the changes while not logged in, but I'm also a wikipedian (check my page below). I removed the word "rectangular" because not all teeing grounds are rectangular and it was misleading. I'm sorry if you thought I was doing it carelessly, I understand why you have reverted it. My fault for not logging in.

Nevertheless, the fact remains that not all teeing grounds are rectangular, so you might want to let it be. But I'm not gonna fight back if you don't :) --Doppelgangland 09:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that's what this is all about. Not being vengeful and try to make this sort of wikidemocracy work. I've found that having one's changes reverted every now and then does not have to be like being slapped in the face. It teaches you a valuable lesson about how you may not be "right" because "right" really does not exist. Makes you have to prove your point, which is a process likely to make you learn new things. Cheers! --Doppelgangland 12:51, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Question
Hi there. I know that "Panjabi MC" with an 'a' looks weird, but isn't that the way it is supposed to be? Even the official website doesn't use the 'u'. Therefore, did the article need to be reverted? Thanks. Thistheman 17:24, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for reviewing me and being nice!   _-M     o     P-_     20:49, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Birthday
It's not a big deal and thanks for the heads up. -- I@n &equiv; talk 04:11, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Excuse Me
Cheers, √αʑʑρεɾ 10:06, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * You recently reversed an edit of mine and posted a message on my talk page
 * I was not experimenting
 * I was posting the name of the owner of the page, as it would be beneficial to the real life friends of his that he has vandalised.
 * I am no noob, so DO NOT refer me to welcome pages, etc.


 * Good job on reverting the edit made by this user. This was probably in ill-faith. Users are not permitted to reveal personal information of other users on Wikipedia. This might be considered as harrassment. The offending edits have been removed from Wikipedia by proper admin action. Keep it up! -- Andy123  (talk) 15:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree with Andy123. You did the right thing. Well done. :) As a reward I'm going to give you a special limited-edition User:Mark WikiCookie (I was the first to give out these cookies: everyone copied the practise from me!). - Mark 15:52, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Identity guidelines
Revealing personal information is very frowned upon and strictly perhibited, as per the Privacy Policy. Saying that a user is from Canada is not considered a violation, but specific details such as name, address, and age, unless already disclosed by the user, is in violation of the policy.   _-M     o     P-_     16:01, 20 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Look up Harassment, which clearly states: Posting another person's personal information (legal name, home or workplace address, telephone number, email address, or other contact information, regardless of whether the information is actually correct) is almost always harassment. This is because it places the other person at unjustified and uninvited risk of harm in "the real world" or other media. This applies whether the person whose personal information is being revealed is a Wikipedia editor or not. Regards, -- Andy123  (talk) 16:07, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Re:Edit count
As per your request, I checked out your editcounts using Interiot's tool 2. You have exactly 1200 edits. You have edited 622 distinct pages. The average edit per page is 1.929. {main} edits: 505, Talk edits: 36, User edits: 132, User talk: 406, Image: 8, Template: 14, Category: 4, Wikipedia: 68, Wikipedia talk: 27. Hope this resolves your matter. I think, you should carefully follow the instructions on the Interiot Tool 2 page, and you will be able to work it out yourself. Regards, -- Andy123  (talk) 17:06, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

To interject for a moment, the instructions can be found here.

To spare you from going there, you only need to add these lines to your monobook:

document.write(' ');

After that, you should be able to get your edit count here.

—   <b style="font-family:Comic Sans MS; color:navy; font-size:small;"> nath  a  nrdotcom  ( T •  C  • W)</b> 21:06, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

√αʑʑρεɾ
I thought that I hadexplained myself. I know this certain person in RL, and he has on numerous occasions vandalized my userpage. I felt that his name should become known to others that he knows from RL. Furthermore, he himself has added my name to my user and talk pages on two occasions. I understand that have broken certain wiki-policies, but must point out that you have taken an unnecessary grouchy tone and to an extent broken the Assume good faith policy. Now lets leave this behind us and have a mohito, -√αʑʑρεɾ 01:00, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism
I wasn't vandalizing Lien-da's article! I'm adding a piece of information that is true - her choice of weapon is a whip! --71.118.83.254 07:09, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Okay, fine. And would you mind adding this picture to the Lien-Da article? I'll add the copyright rationale and tags for you. --71.118.83.254 07:20, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

German Goo Girls
Why have you zapped my addition to German Goo Girls? I have added a perfectly useful piece of information about a favourite actress, with a link to a page I am about to create on her.

195.188.152.12 09:43, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

I suggest you revisit the definition of Vandalism before you go throwing the term around willy nilly. 195.188.152.12 07:57, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

"Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad-faith edits that do not make their bad-faith nature inarguably explicit are not considered vandalism at Wikipedia." 195.188.152.12 08:33, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Please show me where it states that an edit summary is required. You seem obsessed with the presence/absence of an edit summary and seem to assume the absence of one is an automatic indication of vandalism.195.188.152.12 09:07, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

"When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

Yes it is not compulsory to leave edit summaries. But as said above the abscence of edit summaries & the fact that you are editing as an IP address & the fact that you have a history of vandalism warnings, will make your edits look like vandalism."

This seems to be your personal interpretation. And also you do not seem to understand that the IP address is shared by many thousands of users and a history of warnings is quite irrelevant. 195.188.152.12 09:17, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Spliff article
I have lived in almost every english speaking country in the world and i have also experimented with recreational drugs in those countries and i have never come across the term "crutch" for that part of a spliff. so surely anyone could make up a new term for absolutly anything and claim that it is local slang and just add it to wikipedia. so excuse me for trying to cut out the bullsh*t —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.5.167.119 (talk • contribs) 11:41 22 April 2006 (UTC)

very funny
Heh -your 'you have new messages' joke is really very funny. Jasmine10:06, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't bother
My IP changes every time I log in and several genuine wiki contributors have the same group of IPs I do. But don't worry about it I'm bored now and won't be doing any more vanadlism today.
 * If the user continues, after a fourth level warning, contact a sysop (I'm not one). Computerjoe 's talk 13:45, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism on my userpage and elsewhere...
Seems like we're crossing paths quite a bit, hm? Thanks for catching that vandalism on my userpage. Those pesky vandals think they can get away with anything while we sleep. So sad, so sad. Happy editing, I'm sure we'll be talking again. &#149;&#149;\\/\//esleyPinkha//\/\\&#149;&#149; 16:37, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Wow


Hey vandal-whacker!! 1600 already?!? Here's a barnstar for fighting vandalism and for overtaking my edit-count (1605 vs 1604 as of 17:14, 23 April 2006 (UTC)). Do keep up the good work.

Old Skool Esperanzial note
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Cel es tianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar


That was a very impressive achievement. Well done! Stephen Turner (Talk) 18:57, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Seconded. Add some oak leaves to the barnstar.-- ALoan (Talk) 10:43, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Re: Thanks
I've been doing well, and you? :) Since the gallery didn't display well in smaller resolutions, your page now has a new table to organize your shiny awards (feel free to revert). And congrats on the user page vandalism; here's to more! Cheers,  Sango 123   (e)  20:55, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

RFA
Hello Srikeit. Thanks for the offer, but I would like to wait another month at least. I still have a few things I want to do before then - eg, write some articles on Statistical mechanics, Quantum algebras - I promised myself that I would put some "serious content" on wikipedia. Also, I have only been around for 5 months (4 of them strongly, the other moderately). I'm also always worried about how things may turn out. Thankyou for the offer. <span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid; padding:0px 2px 2px 2px; color:white; background-color:darkblue; font-weight:bold">ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 01:12, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Re: Welcoming template
It's shamelessly stolen and modified from User:Ilyanep/Wel (he stole it back to make one for anons too) :) --james  <font color="#336699">°o  09:58, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Cruelty towards wooden cleaning objects
This is your last warning. The next time you make fun of a not-yet-admin, you will be subject to whining for a good amount of time. Consider yourself warned. <font style="background: black" face="none" color="#FFFFFF"><font color="FFA200"> <font color="#D70000"> _-M   <font color="#ffffff">  o     P-_     01:51, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

RAOK barnstar
Thankyou very much for this Srikeit. This specific type of barnstar is quite an honour. :). I have archived half of the current page I think.<span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid; padding:0px 2px 2px 2px; color:white; background-color:darkblue; font-weight:bold">ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 03:57, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Haryana.ogg
Thanks for uploading Image:Haryana.ogg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 06:04, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Akola
Hi Srikeit....Please do not edit the Akola page. The warning is just to keep the troublers away. Also, I am open to comments from Anyone in the discussion section or talk page. If anyone thinks that the Akola page has any wrong info listed should post there comments in talk page. But please do not remove the Warning message at the Top. I hope u understand, how hard it is to keep the wrong people away. I just want to give a clear and true idea of what Akola is to the readers.... Thanks. Regards, Ashish Wankhade 18:49, 27 April 2006 (UTC)wankash.

User page design
500 edits in one day! Amazing stuff Srikeit! If pepole support in RfAs only by looking at your number of edits, everybody will support in one week at this rate! I noticed Sango redesigned your userpage. Is there a place to request a redesign? Regards <b style="color:teal;">Gizza</b><sup style="color:teal;">Chat  <b style="color:teal;">&#169;</b> 01:54, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Wow!
If you keep this up a few more days, I may just nominate you for adminship. ;) <font color="FFA200"> <font color="#D70000"> _-M   <font color="#898989"> o    P-_    02:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, editor's review is mainly for commentry, but I dug up your edit tree;

Total edits	2780

Distinct pages edited	1833

Average edits/page	1.517

First edit	11:19, 20 January 2006

(main)	1215

Talk	40

User	154

User talk	860

Image	364

Template	15

Category	4

Wikipedia	93

Wikipedia talk	35

Now, if you continue editing at this rate (I'm not saying you have to, but just theoretically), in a few days you would probably get lotso support votes from lotso users on an RFA. I recommend doing a bit more namespace talk and Wikipedia space edits, but as I said, say 1 more week and I'd be glad to nominate you. <font color="FFA200"> <font color="#D70000"> _-M   <font color="#898989"> o     P-_    05:40, 28 April 2006 (UTC)


 * If you continue reverting vandalism and your daily activities, I'd say you'll hit well over the minimum in three days or so. Its best to have a healthy amount of 1500-2000 mainspace edits, but fighting vandalism is a fast way to get those edits. <font color="FFA200"> <font color="#D70000"> _-M   <font color="#898989"> o     P-_    05:56, 28 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Mainly by doing some stuff at WP:RFA, WP:AFD and WP:AIV. <font color="FFA200"> <font color="#D70000"> _-M   <font color="#898989"> o     P-_    06:42, 28 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Just a bit more! :P <font color="FFA200"> <font color="#D70000"> _-M   <font color="#898989"> o     P-_    06:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi. Thanks for the barnstar. That was quite unexpected. 500 per day!! You have gone crazy!!! And you seem to be getting 1 barnstar every day too. Great work. I would be glad to support your nomination. But a few suggestions. Try and get experience of other areas of wikipedia for 15-20 days. Especially WP:RfAs so that you know what other editors demand from you. Also spend some time (if you haven't) at CSD, Articles that need wikification, disambiguation, Peer Review, FAC, AfD, etc. so that you are more qualified as an all round editor and also come to interact with wikipedians who don't spend time vandal whacking. Some nice tips can be found here. Anyways, if you need any help, I will be free in a week's time. All the best. - Aksi_great (talk) 06:28, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for everything... *sniff *hug *cry -- Andy123  (talk) 11:19, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * On a serious note, I'd like to see you as an administrator here. Try writing articles, cleaning them up, participating regularly in WP:TFDs, WP:AFDs and various other Wikipedia project page discussions. You'll do well. The spoken files are all good, but I suppose you should have spoken louder? Regards, -- Andy123  (talk) 11:33, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Anthony Clark is gay, check out the IMDB list for him AND the list on Wikipedia about gay american actors. I wasn't vandalizing anything Thank YOu. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.25.144.42 (talk • contribs)

203.213.7.130
Hi, This IP is vandalising again see Articles for deletion/Michael John Ainsworth and should perhaps be blocked. Dl yo ns 493  Ta lk  09:51, 29 April 2006 (UTC)


 * OK thanks - thought you were!  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  10:08, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

AOL IP
Actually it's is that Sango's warning was 3 hours ago, and an AOL IP has no doubt changed hands since then. IF this person continues, I will block, and if it still continues (under a different IP), I'll protect your userpage for you. Prodego <sup style="color:darkgreen;">talk  17:36, 29 April 2006 (UTC)


 * You did mention Deletion guidelines for administrators, and that is the guide, you might find more info at WP:ARL. Also it can't hurt to look at some closed AFDs to get an idea of how it is done. Prodego  <sup style="color:darkgreen;">talk  17:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

rfa
Thanks for the support on my RFA. Unfortunately, it did not achieve consensus. I look forward to your support in a couple months when I apply again. Holler at me if you need anything. &rArr; <font face="Euclid Fraktur"> SWAT  Jester    Ready    Aim    Fire!  19:21, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

thank you
thanks for the welcome and the signature--Chapline R Vine ( talk ¦  ✉  ) '' 02:19, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
I just wanted to say thanks for the recognition. :) Darquis 04:18, 30 April 2006 (UTC)