User talk:Srinjoysarod

Welcome!

Hello, Srinjoysarod, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Srinjoy Mukherjee, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mblumber (talk) 04:43, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Srinjoy Mukherjee


A tag has been placed on Srinjoy Mukherjee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mblumber (talk) 04:43, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Srinjoy Mukherjee
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Srinjoy Mukherjee, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://sandii-sandip.blogspot.ca/2011/07/its-first-time-that-two-talented.html. As a copyright violation, Srinjoy Mukherjee appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Srinjoy Mukherjee has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Srinjoy Mukherjee and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Srinjoy Mukherjee with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Srinjoy Mukherjee.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 13:34, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Hello Srinjoysarod. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Srinjoy Mukherjee, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 13:46, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Srinjoy Mukherjee


A tag has been placed on Srinjoy Mukherjee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:40, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

April 2016
Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Srinjoy Mukherjee. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Sam Sailor Talk! 13:25, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello, I'm Iambic Pentameter. I noticed that in this edit to User:Doug_Weller, you removed all the content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Iambic Pentameter (talk / contribs) 15:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above edit seems to be related to Doug's removal of information from the page Amaan Ali Khan. You should note that as per WP:BLP, and the BLP template on the article talk page, and I quote, "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article." It may be open to question how "contentious" these "associated acts" are, but the obligation to provide sourcing still remains. Seeing as you have, since I started this comment, reverted 3 times in less than an hour, I guess, I am obligated to also tell you at WP:AN/3. John Carter (talk) 15:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 15:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 16:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring, COI editing, BLP violations, vandalism, failure to communicate... Keep this up and your next block will be much longer. --Neil N  talk to me 16:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note you also edited logged out as . Unsourced material in the biography of a living person may not be restored once deleted, and sources must meet our criteria at WP:RS. In any case, you appear to be writing an autobiography. Doug Weller  talk 18:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Daily Observer
Template:Daily Observer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. John Carter (talk) 16:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 16:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your conflict of interest - and sources
First, you shouldn't be editing a page that you have a close relationship to. The subject's Facebook page is your username reversed. You should be suggesting material on the talk page.

Wikipedia articles aren't like Facebook. Their content should be based on what reliable sources say about the subject. And our definition of reliable sources for a living person is pretty strict. You need to read WP:RS carefully and WP:BLP. Doug Weller talk 13:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

You're ignoring what I've said
You continue to add promotional material to an article with which you have a conflict of interest. The lack of reliable sources is also an issue but in this case even the edits were appropriate you should not be adding them to the article. Doug Weller talk 21:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Please treat Doug Weller's "should not" as "don't do that again or you'll be blocked". This time indefinitely as you only seem here to promote yourself. --Neil N  talk to me 22:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your edit at User talk:Peridon
Do not edit other user's posts on other user's talk pages. I have reverted this because you essentially removed what another user wrote and replaced it with yours. -- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  19:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Srinjoy Mukherjee


A tag has been placed on Srinjoy Mukherjee, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pa7958hUc6o. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉  05:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Neil N  <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 05:19, 17 May 2017 (UTC)