User talk:Sro23/Archive 1

April 2016
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Common outcomes does not have an edit summary.&#32;Your edit summary usage is about 50%, trying to always leave at least a short edit summary is a good practice.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 07:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Pied Piper (TV series)
clearup and write plot on Pied Piper (TV series) --Sunuraju (talk) 14:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

The jungle book
I know a lot about the jungle book and that the author, Rudyard Kipling, decribes Baloo the bear as the sleepy brown bear. Since he said that, he must be a Himalayan brown bear since there are no other brown bears in India except for that bear. There is no such thing as a brown sloth bear. There are only one incarnation of Baloo being a sloth bear was the disney's incarnation. The firs cartoon incarnation of Baloo was him shown as a brown bear. Thecoolkidboyy (talk) 03:42, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


 * But in the 2016 movie, Bagheera calls him a sloth bear. I'm sorry, but it doesn't make sense for him to be a himalayan brown bear when he's called otherwise. Also, as stated on Baloo's article, nobody knows exactly what species he is in the books. He has the characteristics of different species, which is why I propose we keep his species simply as bear on The Jungle Book article, anything more would be original research. Sro23 (talk) 03:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


 * As was stated, calling him a "Himalayan brown bear" is original research considering that term has never been used in the Jungle Book novels or movies. Originial research is not allowed on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research. Baloo is named as a Sloth bear in the movie itself. 2601:601:600:4E4C:F1D8:949:21A7:6205 (talk) 14:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Agree with what the anonymous editor has to say. I get that he's a brown looking bear, but if the movie specifically names him as a sloth bear, then that's what he is. It doesn't matter how much of an expert on bears you are, that's what the movie says he is, so we can't change it. Please stop what you're doing and let it go. This whole species debate is ridiculous and definitely not worth getting blocked over.


 * Anyway, here's my two cents on the matter: Himalayan brown bears only occur in northern India, but the Jungle Book takes place in central India, correct? It's very likely Kipling created Baloo not based on one species, but rather a combination of several species. He may very well be an imaginary species of bear in the original books. But in the 2016 movie, his species is outright stated to be a sloth bear.Sro23 (talk) 21:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Hey you recently removed the Animation section of Rajesh khattar which is edited by me that he voiced the Akela in hindi dubbed version as i already watced this movie and i cab identity his voice. But if you want perfect source behind this i can give you.

Below is official youtube link of trailer and their description clears that Rajesh Khattar as the voice of wolf pack’s alpha male Akela www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCgPGFunkig

Follwing is the link of website that also make it clears http://www.filmymonkey.com/bollywood/2016/03/18/hindi-trailer-of-the-jungle-book-out-priyanka-chopras-sultry-voice-as-kaa-will-leave-you-mesmerized/ MYPKhan (talk) 09:10, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Mary Schendlinger persondata
Hi Sro23 - There's probably a good explanation for this edit but you didn't leave anything in the edit summary. Can you tell me why you removed the person data template? Thanks - Themightyquill (talk) 12:12, 23 April 2016 (UTC) Dear Sro23,

Untitled
I am the President of the Teach Peace Foundation. We have never tried to spam Wiki but have provided corrections using only reliable and recognized sources (please see the below email to Wiki). I have been trying to correct information on the Our Lady of Akita page and was instructed by Wikipedia to use the creator talk page but the page creator is a person whose account is closed.

I am writing to you because you made the last edits replacing the corrections. Unfortunately, as a result the incorrect earlier version is now shown again. Unlike my correction, this incorrect version is not supported by recognized reliable sources of information.

My email to Wiki and [redacted]'s response is below.

Please help me get the correct information on Wiki. Ddionisi (talk) 17:15, 10 May 2016 (UTC) David Dionisi Ddionisi (talk) 17:15, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Dear David Dionisi,

This is a content dispute and we do not resolve content disputes by email. You must go to the article talk page and discuss he issues with other editors there.

Yours sincerely, [redacted]

-- Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/ --- Disclaimer: all mail to this address is answered by volunteers, and responses are not to be considered an official statement of the Wikimedia Foundation. For official correspondence, please contact the Wikimedia Foundation by certified mail at the address listed on https://www.wikimediafoundation.org/

09/05/2016 05:32 - David Dionisi wrote:

Dear [redacted], Thank you for helping me. Please know that I made corrections to the Wiki "Our Lady of Akita" article citing the Vatican, Bishop Ito and Sister Agnes which are the most established, recognized and reliable Our Lady of Akita sources in the world. The Vatican published the rules that were in the 1980s and 1990s kept as confidential in 2012. I provided this information to Wiki and see http://ncronline.org/news/vatican/vatican-publishes-rules-verifying-visions-mary The rules clearly state that a local bishop has full authority to authenticate a Marian Apparition and no subsequent Vatican approval is necessary. Someone on your team is deleting this easily provable established and recognized information and in its place retaining an uncited magazine article. As a result, the Wikipedia article is misleading and suggesting the Catholic Church official position on the Our Lady of Akita miracles has been reversed (in fact they are authenticated by the local Bishop which is all that is required and stands because there has never been an official reversal by the Vatican. This is why the December 2015 National Geographics team communicates correctly that the Our Lady of Akita miracles are authenticated by the Catholic Church and see http://news.nationalgeographic.com/content/dam/news/rights-exempt/nat-geo-staff-maps/2015/11/Virgin_Mary/spread.png). Even the link for the English translation of Bishop Ito's 1984 Pastoral Letter on Wiki is an incorrect translation which is easy to prove by just comparing it with Rev. Yasuda's book that includes this letter and has Bishop Ito's statement that everything in the book is a correct English translation (Bishop Ito spoke both Japanese and English fluently). Please advise me how to proceed. I have already tried to help get correct information on Wiki several times. My multi-hour effort to help correct the errors has been deleted by Wiki. I want the truth to be known and need your advice on next steps (if you can see the earlier work I tried to add, please go to the Vatican and other links which show the most established and reliable sources). Even the YouTube video Wiki currently links to is a YouTube video posted by someone that does not have the copyright to use the video whereas the YouTube Akita and the Fatima Secret documentary is the official and legal version of both the 1990 and 2015 video (the Teach Peace Foundation shot the 2015 video and has the rights for the 1990 video). Thank you, David Dionisi, PresidentTeach Peace Foundation 539 J StreetDavis, CA 95616 530-554-7061

Shao Tong bolding
I reverted this. Per that policy, they really shouldn't. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

But thanks for your other contributions, as well as the prod to go see if anything new had occurred. I was wondering when it would. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=720824853 your edit] to Power pop may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * quote|Pete Townshend coined the phrase to define what the Who did. For some reason, it didn't stick

May 2016
As far as the deletions on this article Freeman Parkway Bridge, WP:Memorial states "subjects of encyclopedia articles must satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements. Wikipedia is not the place to memorialize deceased friends, relatives, acquaintances, or others who do not meet such requirements" Duncker is not the subject of the article, the bridge is. If the article were about the individual only, I could see where that would be contrary the guidelines. Neither is the text 'memorializing' the individual, it's simply the bare facts as reported by reliable sources, It's certainly more notable than the uncited graffiti section, and I don't think the article is improved by removing both instead of including both. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.143.225.168 (talk • contribs) 13:15, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * But the proxy is going to insist his death is non-notable (even if I include a billion sources) because the sources are all from the local media. What do I say to that? Sro23 (talk) 13:38, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * It looks like the article has been reverted already. Well, I'm not sure how long that edit's going to stick for, but in the mean time, I've added information about his death to another pertinent article (the high school he went to). Sro23 (talk) 14:12, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * When people are editing for personal reasons, there is nothing you can say to convince them. All you can do is what you've already been doing, namely to explain your position through edits summaries and talk page discussion and to report open proxies as your time and patience allow.  As you've noticed, a veteran editor has already reverted; therefore you must have convinced someone your position is valid.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.143.225.227 (talk) 14:57, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
 * Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Morning Musume, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kudo Haruka. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Please warn vandals
Hi.

Thanks for recently undoing vandalism on Dazed and Confused (song). In the future, when you undo vandalism, could you please use the appropriate template to warn the user (IP or registered) to stop their behaviour?

There are many different warning templates available to use. Here are some popular ones. Please see their documentation pages for instructions.


 * {{subst:Test}} - For an obviously not malicious, but clearly not helpful mistake.
 * {{subst:Uw-vandalism1}} - For the first case of vandalism.
 * {{subst:Uw-vandalism2}} - For the second case.
 * {{subst:Uw-vandalism3}} - Third.
 * {{subst:Uw-vandalism4}} - Fourth or final warning.
 * {{subst:Uw-vandalism4im}} - Last or only warning for severe situations.

Each time we use these warnings they should be placed under the title "==July 2024==" (updated to the current month and year), on the user's talk page. If previous warnings have been given under that title, add the next level warning beneath the others, within that section. Clearly, individual cases must be dealt with as seems fit. If the user has not been actively vandalizing for a few weeks or months, start a new section.

The value of warning is three fold.
 * Firstly: it may be heeded.
 * Secondly: it allows other editors to quickly see if that user has been vandalizing frequently or recently.
 * Lastly: administrators require that warnings have been given before they can or will act against persistent vandals.

If a vandal is on a spree or has reached a level 4 vandalism warning and is currently active, waste no time in reporting them to Administrator intervention against vandalism.

Thanks again for helping to protect articles on Wikipedia. Happy editing!   17:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

FYI
Thanks for the thanks on the reverts of our favorite MoS 'editor'. However, I've been checking and this 2600 IP does appear to be undoing Who R U's sockpuppet edits. Most of the time. I'm still suspicious of their obsession with fixing Who's obsession, so we'll keep an eye on all the articles still. Cheers, and thanks for the help! :) -- ‖ Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract  ‖ 18:34, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Ok this is really confusing, but I'm actually 90% certain 2600/ is the Who R U? ipsock and ip 2605 is someone else with similar editing habits. For example, look at this edit 2605 made on Christopher Walken from April:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christopher_Walken&diff=718000583&oldid=717836877. Who R U? didn't start editing until May. Sro23 (talk) 19:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Because merely hitting thanks isn't enough ...

 * No problem, I just really can't stand it when people revert to "punish" you. Sro23 (talk) 05:40, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I've identified the likely culprit as, "her"self a sock of two other users blocked years ago. After a recent unblocking discussion degenerated quickly, I wound up revoking talk page access. Both the JP "she" (the username is a character in V.C. Andrews' books, so I don't think it's real) used to add a last insult to that page before it was protected, and the one you blocked, resolve to the same ISP in the Phoenix area, so I'm pretty sure they're related. Daniel Case (talk) 05:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Dude all my edits are backed by sources and citations. I am a history Masters grad, why you deleting changes just to satisfy your ego... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gullupat (talk • contribs) 07:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

I have been reported
For edit-warring. Isn't that special? I'm surprised you were not reported as well. Because, you know, reasons. Not to worry, 'twill all work out. Cheers! ;) -- ‖ Ebyabe talk -  Repel All Boarders  ‖ 09:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)


 * This is what, the fourth or fifth time he's reported someone? Lol, every time he ends up getting blocked anyway. Sro23 (talk) 13:45, 18 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I know. She obviously does not learn from her mistakes. I love when I get reported on the anti-vandal boards, since it inevitably rebounds on the reporter. Plus that they expect me to act angrily, so I'm Mister Nice Guy instead. Which says more about them. Cheers. :)  -- ‖ Ebyabe talk -  General Health  ‖ 18:22, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank You
A hearty thank you for reverting and reporting the delightful little troll you caught on my talk page. Kaobear (talk) 20:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)


 * You're welcome, nobody likes trolls :P Sro23 (talk) 20:36, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Lu Jun Hong
Lu Jun Hong

What do you mean by better sources? If there are direct links to the the news articles, I'd have added them. The Chinese articles are, on the other hand, Chinese. Can you indicate which sources you think are unreliable instead if of removing the entire section?

I have added a section under the talk page, if you are disagreeable to the information, please discuss at the talk page instead of just removing the entire section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccctttttt (talk • contribs) 04:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC) I am sorry if this is a bad place to write I wasn't sure where. I don't think my edits for the Oakland Mall were incorrect or irrelevant and I think they should stay. Thank you for your concern.

thank you
thank you د. عمار جمال الكندي (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Adotchar. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Andgopink, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Adotchar (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

andgopink
thanks sro23, Adotchar, this page inculudes materials about contemporary artist andgopink, who's remarkable person in modern visual art scene as you know contemporary movement in russia struggled with official propoganda, i'd like you understand this issue about modern Russian Artist... thanks in advance. (vino774) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vino774 (talk • contribs) 20:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I could find no evidence of notability or credible sources. I'm sorry but until you find some suitable sources could you please stop recreating the article? Sro23 (talk) 20:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Note that the article has been deleted. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 20:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

A Hershey Bar for you


Hamham31 has given you a Hershey Bar! Hershey bars promote WikiLove through chocolately goodness and hopefully this one has made your day better. Hershey bars are wonderfully delicious! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a Hershey bar, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

''Thank you for your continuous edit to the article Lord Byron, despite containing vandalism made by other editors. Keep up the good work.''

Spread the goodness of Hershey bars by adding {{subst:Hershey Bar}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

User:Hamham31 (User talk:Hamham31) 03:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Offensive comment?
How was the message that I put on user:Joeychgo's page offensive? 2602:306:3357:BA0:7B:B5C0:498B:9B21 (talk) 05:03, 21 June 2016 (UTC)


 * It's offensive because: you keep harassing a user who clearly wants you off their talk page as evidenced by talk page's history. Please stop restoring content the user removes. Sro23 (talk) 05:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Untitled
what's no civil at all is deleting a reasonable contribution that's in the public's bets interest just like that and that I spent about an hour crafting. Wikipedia is full of bullies and there's no redress, so I'm outa here. Eventually there will only be 4 or 5 "civil" bullies left, you folkas can do all the editing. Sayonara. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juandresh (talk • contribs) 09:35, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Some infos regarding to delete the message twice
I try to send the friendly contact message to old Wiki friend, but you delete twice already. Can provide to me reasons for deleted?



--B767-400ERX (talk) 23:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)


 * For one thing, you admit in the messages you leave that you are User:B767-500. A user who is indefinitely blocked. Which makes you a sockpuppet. And thus you should be blocked too. -- ‖ Ebyabe talk - State of the Union  ‖ 00:13, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi how do I Chang it to 3forpc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mosscat1977 (talk • contribs) 06:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

talk
He had done it to my page first. Why was that okay for him to do then? He was guilty of the same crime! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Makk3232 (talk • contribs) 03:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, he shouldn't have done that. The user appears to be retired, so there's really nothing I can do about it. But that doesn't mean you need to do the same to his page. Sro23 (talk) 03:43, 22 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Okay, I apologize, and I appreciate you seeing my side. I will leave it alone. Thanks for being cool. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Makk3232 (talk • contribs) 03:45, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

sources about greek super cup
-www.sport-fm.gr/article/107213

-www.rsssf.com/tablesg/grksupcuphist.html

-This is only trouth.EUROPEAN SUPER CUPS begins at 1972,Italy,Belgium,France,Greece,Germany,itd 1978-1987.--Vrahomarinaner (talk) 06:41, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

ANI-notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding removal of anon user's abusive edit summaries and comments in your talk page. The thread is Abusive language and threats. Thank you. --Στέλιος Πετρουλάκης (talk) 08:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Redirects
I need to ask you something about the redirects. If there are no pages using the redirect, how do we get rid of said redirect link? I'm just asking because the "Modern Warfare Remastered" redirect doesn't have any links in any of the articles, so I feel we should get rid of it. (Chocolatejr9 (talk) 03:27, 23 June 2016 (UTC))


 * Please don't blank pages. If you think the redirect is unhelpful, list it for discussion. In my opinion, just because nothing links there doesn't mean the redirect shouldn't exist. Check how many page views it gets; doesn't seem that harmful to me. Sro23 (talk) 03:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Rollback and reviewer userrights granted
Hello Sro23. Your account has been [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A granted] the "rollbacker" and "pending changes reviewer" user rights. These user rights allow you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes and quickly revert the edits of other users.


 * Rollback user right
 * Please keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin).


 * Pending changes reviewer user right
 * The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection enabled is located at Special:StablePages. You may find the following pages useful to review:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing.
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes.
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of reviewer or rollback. If you no longer want either of these user rights, contact me and I'll remove it, alternatively you can leave a request on the administrators' noticeboard. Happy editing! Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Change of page
Hi, yes I just took a template and was planning to work on it, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hkeviinn (talk • contribs) 21:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Pathanamthitta.NH-12
Who's the master? --Neil N  talk to me 15:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)


 * User:Saatvik.Jacob Material Scientist Sro23 (talk) 15:39, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

hasty
please slow down less than 10 minutes between an article creation and tagging for CSD looks more like bitting if your work NPP please start at the oldest entries not the newest. Gnangarra 06:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Talk Page Edit Removal
This was done because the user has been trolling on my page. Hasn't gotten the answer he/she has demanded, refuses to follow the rules, and is now forum shopping. So, I'm applying WP:DENY to the whole thing. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 08:43 on June 27, 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know what to say other than the comment didn't seem that bad to me, but I am not involved. Sro23 (talk) 19:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I was just giving you an explanation. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 01:38 on June 28, 2016 (UTC)

Your fan...
...has gotten a 1 week rangeblock. --Neil N  talk to me 06:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Camisole
FYI: wp:RFPP here Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Impersonations
FYI: I haven't created any doppelgänger accounts. If you see a user with a name similar to mine, report it immediately. Sro23 (talk) 03:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your request
1 month /29 rangeblock. --Neil N  talk to me</i> 04:22, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but this person is back. The IP's are from all around the world, so they might be editing via open proxies. Sro23 (talk) 04:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * can you help out? --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 04:27, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't watch this page and don't receive pings. Yes, they are kind of "proxies" (upon a brief look), i.e. rangeblocks won't work, and semiprotection would be a more efficient route. Materialscientist (talk) 08:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The problem is it's not the articles they're attacking, it's Sro23. Whatever article Sro23 touched as part of their patrolling would turn into a revertfest. Do you still advocate semi-protection in this case? I will certainly heed your advice. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 13:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * This is a standard situation where semiprotection is the best remedy. It can be brief if the disruption is caused only by the maniac, or can be longer if there is a history of vandalism/spam/etc. Materialscientist (talk) 22:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, thank you. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 23:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Unreliable source?
You said that famousbirthdays.com was an unreliable source on 'Maty Noyes' page, I do not understand what was unreliable about this source. Please could you tell me your reasoning for this. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipediaeditperson (talk • contribs) 19:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I direct you to WP:IRS. The tell-tale signs of unreliable online sources are often a lack of author, lack of credibility for publisher, and sometimes but not always .com, .info, .net open domains. If you read the website's about page, you'll see that under the "CONTRIBUTING TO FAMOUS BIRTHDAYS" section it implies anyone can submit to the site (just like wikipedia) therefore it is not trustworthy. Sro23 (talk) 19:34, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

I understand that it is able to be contributed by anyone, but as you say Wikipedia is the same - it is a bit contradictory to say that a website is not reliable, because that would make Wikipedia unreliable. Also, you cannot just update the website famousbirthdays.com - you can suggest an update, but this has to be reviewed prior to being put on the website, so I feel that this makes it a suitable and reliable source. Would you agree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipediaeditperson (talk • contribs) 20:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * But that's the thing, Wikipedia isn't reliable (even if it may contain links to reliable sources). I still don't trust the website because so little is known about who exactly runs it. Why should we believe them? Sro23 (talk) 20:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Ok, I dont agree that Wikipedia is unreliable - there are a lot of members and if someone makes a mistake, it is usually picked up by others. Also, as I said, the famousbirthdays website verifies every edit, making it even more reliable than Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipediaeditperson (talk • contribs) 20:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Desalination
Can someone please revert the vandalism on Desalination now. Lol. Sro23 (talk) 08:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Greeku Veerudu
What is the necessity of redirecting it to the director and adding categories?PhysicsScientist (talk) 00:15, 1 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Do you mean Greeku Veerudu (1998 film)? I assume it's because it doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for films, so redirect to its director. And what's wrong with adding categories to redirects? If you think it's not a helpful redirect, you can list it for discussion but please don't blank pages. Sro23 (talk) 00:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Doing like this increased the films (which were created) by the director by 1. I just do not like it. What will happen if it is deleted?PhysicsScientist (talk) 12:33, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

About the edit on List of Space Shuttle missions.
How is reinstating an IP warriors edits not vandalism? The IP has been blocked for his malicious edits. If the IP just wanted to comment out the entire page, why would he make any "good" edits? I'm a bit confused. MegaMan1988 (talk) 04:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Just because an editor is blocked, does not mean all of their edits should automatically be reverted. The edit was actually constructive (aside from the unexplained commenting out). Blindly reverting every edit from blocked users is not the best idea, especially if it reinstates BLP and copyright violations, vandalism, typos, factual errors, etc. Sro23 (talk) 04:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Someone really hates me. I log into literally hundreds of my edits being reverted every day. That's crazy, and in the end I'm only creating more work for everyone else.

I decided I'm going to stop or at least slow down editing for a bit until things cool off. Thank you so much everyone who reverts, protects, blocks, reports, etc. I truly appreciate it. Sro23 (talk) 15:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Relax. If he/she/and-or-it isn't reverting your edits, it'll only happen to someone else. There are many eyes watching. Again, relax. It's all good.   Aloha27   talk  15:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Point me...
To the relevant banning information? Lady of  Shalott  04:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Tikeem cumberbatch uttp tcgp own Sro23 (talk) 04:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Lady  of  Shalott  04:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Edit warriors
Always worth making sure the problem user has been explicitly warned not to edit war, as they may be blissfully unaware that it's ever a problem - just stick a uw-ew template on their user page. I'll give Wythy the benefit of the doubt on their latest revert as they might have been writing their "determined to conceal these *facts*" edit summary while I was warning them. --McGeddon (talk) 18:20, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I was going to do so. Sro23 (talk) 18:22, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

The "professional"
Our favorite editor has returned to her old ways at Ginnifer Goodwin et al. I've requested the Robby Benson page be semi-protected, and that perhaps the Goodwin page be put under pending changes protection. If you want to warn him, feel free. I don't feel it's necessary to edit-war with it over the changes. An admin will do the protecting and likely block the entity. Maybe even a rangeblock. Anyhoo, cheerio. :) -- ‖ Ebyabe talk - State of the Union  ‖ 07:45, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Editor wondering if you are a robot and some other stuff ;)
Hello Sro23 i am not sure if you are a robot or not but either way would like if you could reply soon. I do not feel in anyway me edit was bias and am the slightest bit shocked that Ukraine even though i am American doesn't have its own segment even though there are picture of Ukrainian vodka being used in the article. I apologise if taken wrongly but am just trying to find a solution to the very obvious mistake which is needed to be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.164.156.203 (talk) 17:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Never mind that- you should play close attention to the messages has left you on your Talk Page. You should have been reported for edit-warring, but he is an amazingly forgiving editor. May I suggest though, that you refrain from making another edit to the Vodka article. If you do, it wil likely be interpreted as a continuing of your ethno-centric point-of-view pushing and either he or I will be forced to seek administrative attention. Cheers! -and happy editing.  <sub style="color:green;>Muffled  <sup style="color:red;">Pocketed  18:35, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Sock
This user (Bysomalilander) is another sock of that recently banned user. I will assist you in the clean up as well in the meantime. AcidSnow (talk) 22:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * My apologize it's not a sock but rather the owner. AcidSnow (talk) 01:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you...so much. omg. According to the SPI the account is unrelated (despite acting the exact same way), so the situation is more complicated than I first thought. Maybe we should ask WikiProject Somalia for guidance? Sro23 (talk) 01:05, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * AcidSnow ,Sro23 (talk) you two make me sick instead of apologizing to me you both for accusing me you guys apologize to each other. what kind of a movie is this Sooraan and Jawan ?Bysomalilander (talk) 01:11, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * They're just only making a big mistake on that part, please don't accuse them as they apologize each other? They're also a people like you, making a mistake sometimes. User:Hamham31 (User talk:Hamham31) 00:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * What are your thoughts on this new account that has recently surfaced: Bluebluellllll? I have already gone and reported it as I believe there is enough similarities already present. Also, I am not sure what exactly the project page will do for us in this situation. I usually do my best to act fast when there's a disturbance. AcidSnow (talk)

Louisa Johnson
I took the liberty of leaving a high level BLP warning for a revert you made to this article. We edit conflicted on the revert but you never left a warning on the user's talk page, so eventually I did. Meters (talk) 07:22, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah, i see what probably happened. You reverted the minor 2nd bit of vandalism and never noticed the major BLP edit it was hiding. Meters (talk) 07:24, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I didn't even bother warning, I just went straight to AIV, since the account is cleary WP:NOTHERE. It's still not blocked yet though...Sro23 (talk) 07:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I should have checked there I guess. No biggie. I was just touching base since I don't usually leave warnings on someone else's rvt. Meters (talk) 07:29, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

How to revert move changes?
Hi sorry I'm new to all this and trying to correct an error, someone incorrectly moved the SimBin Studios page to the Sector3 Studios page, they should be 2 separate pages as they are 2 completely separate companies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by USteppin (talk • contribs) 13:16, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi. It's okay I understand. What you can do is place the WP:RMCM template on the talk page of Sector3 Studios, requesting it be moved to SimBin, to preserve history. Then a new article can be created for Sector3 Studios. We'll need some reliable sources to verify that the companies have split first however. Once the page moves are sorted out, I can also change the incorrect redirects as well. Sro23 (talk) 14:51, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

star NGC 67
My Recent purchase of a Name a star pack gave me the ability to rename the star NGC 67, the information about the star that is provided is different to the wiki page so decided to change it based on the sources provided. But my changes were been reverted by you, please give me the ability to edit the page based on MY sources Thanks Jake Rattlesnake7501 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:26, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Rattlesnake7501, please read this. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 14:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I've got some magic beans here if you want them...? <sub style="color:green;>Muffled  <sup style="color:red;">Pocketed  14:50, 8 July 2016 (UTC)


 * You know it's not even a single star anyway, it's a galaxy? I hope you didn't pay much! Andy Dingley (talk) 15:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

My edits
Why are you reverting useful edits Kiuy1 (talk) 19:24, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Because you are an obvious sockpuppet. Save us all the time and give it up. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:38, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Of User:Filipz123? Classic! What an imagination he's got <sub style="color:green;>Muffled  <sup style="color:red;">Pocketed  19:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 20:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

For your continuing work

 * And occasionally me it turns out :-) Many thanks for the reverts and enjoy your weekend. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 04:12, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Spam immediate
is a good way to give an immediate final warning. I like the blacklist notice in the template. Do be careful as giving a -4im- warning will cause Huggle to want to send a wp:AIV report and an admin may be reluctant to block for a few warnings. Then again, some seem quite willing to do so. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:48, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

No worries
No worries; I'm used to socks. Take a gander at Sockpuppet investigations/Никита-Родин-2002/Archive. ~ Rob 13 <sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">Talk 06:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Just wanted to say
I really wanted to revert this guy and say "no you fuck off" but you did it before me..--Bolter21 (talk to me) 23:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Sorry, lol...Sro23 (talk) 23:33, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

NYC Dcas
you keep changing this wiki page with incorrect information, please look up this job in google and will see that they are not listed as police agency or department. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:7085:AB00:AD8A:5368:2F87:EA3A (talk) 19:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

click on the wiki page hyper link and you will see the job description and employment requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:7085:AB00:AD8A:5368:2F87:EA3A (talk) 19:36, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I will explain: I saw the page history and noticed repeated unexplained removals of sourced claims with new unsourced info, so I restored it to the version before the problematic editing began. Please, if you want to make a change, support it with citations. It's not my job to do the fact checking for you, it's actually your job if you want to change/introduce new information, per WP:BURDEN. Sro23 (talk) 19:46, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

And you are who?
I think the user and the user  are the same guy, or they are working in meatpuppetry,Chronus send a message in Portuguese threatening me and saying "WE will work against you". "WE"?

I need to advice that this user Chronus is an dictator in the Portuguese Wiki (No exaggeration), he is known to all users of the Wiki-pt as rude and possessive, preventing all editing in articles where he touchs. Already quarreled with multiple users both Wiki-PT and even here, always wanting to impose his point of view. He is also known for extreme ideological bias (he is communist) and collusion with Wiki-PT administrators. You should kick this guy over here forever.Tamakukan (talk) 22:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Clearly you and Bazaira are the same person. I'm not going to waste my time responding to this. Sro23 (talk) 23:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * "I'm not going to waste my time responding to this," he says while wasting his time responding to it. Lol! Sro, you're so stupid. -YouKnowWho79 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.40.95 (talk) 23:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Says the person who wanted me to "fox" the List of Another World characters article. lol Sro23 (talk) 23:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Meh. Autocorrect, you know. At least my brain was on the right track. There's never any logic to anything you say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.40.95 (talk) 23:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits
Who was that person? --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 00:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It's User:Cebr1979, he thinks I don't contribute enough. I guess I'm supposed to leave the vandalism alone. Sro23 (talk) 00:22, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Do you want a semiprotect? --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 00:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes please do so. Sro23 (talk) 00:40, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I read what he wrote... it's delusional horseshit. Been here over ten years and I probably have less article creations than you. Early on, I came across a comment from someone high up in the WMF. He said if content creators all left, Wikipedia could go on for years. Information would gradually go out of date, but it'd still be there. If the vandal fighters all left, Wikipedia would be overrun in a few days by vandals, spammers, and trolls. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 00:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I just blocked one of his commonly-used ranges. Hopefully, that will slow him down a tad. ~ Rob 13 <sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">Talk 00:56, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * as well as Sro23, would you mind pinging me when you see Cebr pop up? Based on my looking around, his IP ranges generally have very little collateral damage and long-term blocks should be worthwhile. Looking at his ranges, a lot of vandalism is coming from them that hasn't necessarily been connected with him in the past. Knowing what IPs he uses and how often makes it easier to find and block ranges with little collateral damage to limit the vandalism. Thanks! ~ Rob 13 <sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">Talk 04:06, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * , maybe create a LTA page or subpage somewhere where we can list IPs? --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 16:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It already exists at Long-term abuse/Cebr1979. Feel free to create a subsection for specific blocked IPs/ranges on that page with dates of the blocks. I'll probably add the ones I've done recently to it later tonight (and create the section if someone hadn't already done so by then). ~ Rob 13 <sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">Talk 17:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * You think you've seen vandalism, Rob? I'll freaking show you vandalism if you start following me around! You're nothing compared to the others I've gone up against and I'm still here, boy. Piss me off. I dare you. I'll effing show you disruption. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.37.85 (talk) 05:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It's the Sundance Kid-! <sub style="color:green;>Muffled <sup style="color:red;">Pocketed  17:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok. ~ Rob 13 <sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">Talk 16:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * This is nothing urgent, but I thought I should let you know: Cebr1979 is still evading his block. He's being a little less obvious about it this time but I know it's him. Here are just a few IP's he's been using lately:, , , , , , Sro23 (talk) 03:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

~ Rob 13 <sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">Talk 04:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Responded, sorry for taking so long. Also, could you block ? Static IP that Cebr keeps returning to. Sro23 (talk) 23:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Suamargad
actually the name of the fort is Sumargad and not Suamargad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccmarathe (talk • contribs) 15:06, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If that's true, then you can request Suamargad be moved to Sumargad. Please don't do cut and paste moves, per WP:CUTPASTE. Sro23 (talk) 15:12, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your support
... on the "3 GB barrier" page. Jeh (talk) 02:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, it's clear the IP has some crazy personal agenda against you. Sro23 (talk) 03:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Or against the person he thinks I am—somebody on some other forum. He also keeps quoting stuff that doesn't at all say what he thinks it says, thinking it supports his claims. But the final straw, his accusation that I hacked into an MSDN page to make it support my position, is just sad. Jeh (talk) 09:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for the "oo" correction on carbon bubble. 69.58.42.90 (talk) 21:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * You're welcome Sro23 (talk) 21:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Thoughts?
Do you have any idea who the IP vandal at Template:Fargo TV might be? comes to mind, who recently had a ban appeal denied at AN because he was found to have been recently socking. It's certainly his topic area, but I don't know if any other sockmasters operate in this topic area. ~ Rob 13 <sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">Talk 22:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It's User:Hypocritepedia. Sro23 (talk) 22:41, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Was just on my way back over to tell you I had figured it out myself. Thanks for the help. ~ Rob 13 <sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">Talk 22:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)