User talk:Ss.iliev

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:BruceDickinson 4jun2007.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Bruce Dickinson 4jun2007.jpg. The copy called Image:Bruce Dickinson 4jun2007.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 09:33, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Bruce Dickinson
No I didn't. It was a colleague of mine. His name is Asen Tonev and he is a professional photographer. 22:28, 16 June 2007 (GMT+2)

Did you take that photo of Bruce at download? It's excellent, I love it! ≈  Maurauth  ( nemesis~☆ ) 20:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Great picture: Image:BruceDickinson_4jun2007.jpg. Thanks for the upload. Pass on the compliments. Sancho 21:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, the image is missing some important licencing details. Can you include on the image description page the name of the copyright holder (Asen Tonev I assume?); even though he has released it under the GFDL, he still holds the copyright. Also, can you get proof from him by e-mail that he has released this image under the GFDL? Sancho 07:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:BruceDickinson_4jun2007.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BruceDickinson_4jun2007.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 13:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC)