User talk:Ss168948/sandbox

Article Evaluation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Targeted_temperature_management
 * What is the standard target temperature one has to reach to be therapeutic?
 * Dates are from 2010, need more recent research
 * What distracted me was the layout. I like how it gave basically a run down in the first paragraph but there needs to be some structure change to make it flow. I felt like I was jumping around on topics.
 * Needs to be factual cases where this has worked and how the outcomes would have been different without this technique
 * I feel the veiwpoint of the benefits of doing this is underused. It gave great explaination of how it is done, but hardly touched on the impact it has on affects long term for the patient
 * The links do work and correspond with what the article is trying to say and has factual evidence
 * Most of the articles are those from peer-reviewed or Cochrane articles which icreases the credibility of the information given
 * On the talk page, some say that better working needs to be done to be more accurate (like the water blanket) and many more comments were about others adding specific brand names into the article to "advertise" their equipment- which I found odd. Some of the comments were almost arguing with eachother and placing blame on other users for trying to edit as a way of advertising. There was also concern about a retracted article that was used as a reference force for the article and the need to remove the infomormation pretaining to that article
 * The article was rated C-Class and recieved a peer review by WikiEditors and has been archived