User talk:Ss4craig

A tag has been placed on Driven Networks, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. P4k 01:29, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Driven Networks
Please substantiate the notability of Driven Networks now, or remove your hold-on. You do not get the option of two days free publicity. You can use the talk page to assert the notability if you do not have time to improve the article. A couple of sentences outlining your case will do. --Tagishsimon (talk)

Notability
I would like to make know and reference some of the platforms and such being used in corporations such as Driven Networks. I would include many of the existing entries on wikipedia as VoiceXML, VMWARE, Server Consolidation, Open Source Applications, Asterick PBX.

Let me know if more is required for this case.

Thanks. --ss4craig (talk)


 * Actually notability isn't that relevant since the article is blatant advertising no matter how notable the company is. Read the text on the speedy deletion tag at the top of the page, if you haven't already.--P4k 02:23, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

REPLY
 * Don't take this the wrong way but how would you justify this one.... Intercon Security. It seems to be advertising to me. Whatever the case may be what would you suggest I do? Create an article on a specific topic that Driven Networks would provide ?

Thanks, ss4craig


 * Umm, arguing that another company article is worthless is not exactly a sure-fire way of arguing for your article. P4k is right - not only is there considerable doubt as to the notability of the company, the text at the moment does read as an advert. May I ask if you have some connection with the company? --Tagishsimon (talk)


 * Again, don't take this the wrong way I am not trying to justify my "advertising", but I wanted a bit more clarification as to Wikipedia's usage, as I am fairly new to it. I guess it would be best for me to browse around a bit more and use existing articles as guidelines, as per the content to be displayed. Thanks again for your help. Lastly you can go ahead with the Driven Networks deletion. --ss4craig


 * Thanks. Notability might be the place to start, and perhaps Conflict of interest. As you observe, per Intercon Security, existing articles may not always match policy aspirations. --Tagishsimon (talk)

Goin digital
A tag has been placed on Goin digital, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unverified neologism

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 23:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Reply...

Sorry I am a bit new to this, but would you care to explain how this article is ridiculous. On what basis is such an article considered ridiculous.

Thanks, ss4craig

FYI... Neologisms: As with hoaxes, unless the article is obviously ridiculous, a wider forum is necessary to evaluate the currency of specialized terminology.

AfD nomination of Goin digital
Goin digital, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Goin digital satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Goin digital and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Goin digital during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Maxim 23:12, 14 August 2007 (UTC)