User talk:Ssasson

The article Gabriella Fuller has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 19:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Fuckable art
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fuckable art, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. Dethme0w 03:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * You get five days with the Proposal for Deletion. That should be plenty of time.  What you don't get is to vandalize my user page.  Discussion belongs on talk pages. Dethme0w 04:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Fuckable art
Fuckable art, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Fuckable art satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Fuckable art and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Fuckable art during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dethme0w 04:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

A response in defense of Fuckable art
I did not realize that removing the templates would have such dire consequences. Unfortunately, I've lost a great deal of my content and am unable to restore it from any of the history pages.


 * Please don't try to. This article has now been deleted twice because it was inappropriate for inclusion in our encyclopedia on several different levels.  You're welcome to contribute constructively, and please don't get the idea that there's some sort of censorship agenda afoot here, but not all subjects qualify and you really need to think for a minute before you start a new article on this one.  Thanks for making the effort.  Dethme0w 04:40, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

And please don't add further nonsense like what you just did. An administrator is very likely to block you at this point. Please be carerful. --76.79.100.242 (talk) 03:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Tess Brokaw, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Exxolon (talk) 03:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Tess Brokaw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Exxolon (talk) 03:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)