User talk:Sscheral

Template:Lingayatism
Dear Sir, I would appreciate your wide interests in Lingayatism and it's wiki articles. The fact you have been mentioning about Shiva not being Lingayat deity is hugely debated one and holds no public consensus. Also, the term Shiva was used by various Sharanas for Ishtalinga itself and nowhere in the template the word Shiva would redirect to the page of Vedic deity Rudra. The fact you have been pointing out has been aggressively endorsed by just a single school of thought, the Puritan one, but folk Lingayatism is something deviating as you can observe the religious and spiritual practices of Lingayats from Pune to ooty. Thank You and awaiting insightful reply.    ~ Irrigator   talk  01:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Lingayatism
Dear Sir, I would like to request you, not to repeatedly change the image of the Template:Lingayatism, since it is thickly colored as well as absurd looking and the word Lingayata is already mentioned in the template itself not warranting an alternate image. Let's, always hope for the consensus.Hail our beloved Lord Basavanna(PBUH).--    ~ Irrigator   talk  04:37, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hardekar Manjappa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sirsi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:LORD BASAVA MINISTER.JPG


A tag has been placed on File:LORD BASAVA MINISTER.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redtigerxyz Talk 06:17, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Basava, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Human equality and Humanity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

List of Lingayats
{[subst:uw-badlistentry|List of Lingayats}} - Arjayay (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:LingayatKannada.tif


The file File:LingayatKannada.tif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)